I fully understand your problem, but it can't be solved easily. The registration of the Web-ContextPath is per Bundle and over all available Connections, while the VirtualHost component only makes sure it's only available to VirtualHost X and the default Connector, while it's not available to VirtualHost Y.
So for example the following integration Test [1] shows it, the War is registered on the given ContextPath and for the given VirtualHost. The second tests this with the second connector [2]. The Web-ContextPath is verified while the WABs are registerd through the web-Extender. [3] And there a second WAB with the same Web-ContextPath is put on hold. While the VirtualHost is added to the registering Bundle after the Web-ContextPath is registered, the final connection between the Bundle HttpContext (bound to the Bundle Context and therefore also to the WebContext path) is done while registering the HttpContext. So what I got from your descriptions you actually require the second part of the jetty virtual host description [7]. This can't be done, as this kind of xml isn't parsed by Pax-Web as it's a mediation layer. In the end you can try to use a vanilla Jetty instead then. [1] - https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/blob/master/pax-web-itest/pax-web-itest-container/pax-web-itest-container-jetty/src/test/java/org/ops4j/pax/web/itest/jetty/JettyConfigurationExtendedIntegrationTest.java#L66 [2] - https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/blob/master/pax-web-itest/pax-web-itest-container/pax-web-itest-container-jetty/src/test/java/org/ops4j/pax/web/itest/jetty/JettyConfigurationExtendedIntegrationTest.java#L106-L111 [3] - https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/blob/master/pax-web-extender-war/src/main/java/org/ops4j/pax/web/extender/war/internal/WebObserver.java#L129 [4] - https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/blob/master/pax-web-extender-war/src/main/java/org/ops4j/pax/web/extender/war/internal/parser/WebAppParser.java#L797-L807 [5] - https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/blob/master/pax-web-runtime/src/main/java/org/ops4j/pax/web/service/internal/HttpServiceStarted.java#L1136-L1166 [6] - https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/blob/master/pax-web-runtime/src/main/java/org/ops4j/pax/web/service/internal/HttpServiceStarted.java#L1136-L1166 [7] - https://www.eclipse.org/jetty/documentation/9.3.x/configuring-virtual-hosts.html 2016-10-09 19:00 GMT+02:00 Pavel Kastornyy <pavelkastor...@gmail.com>: > Hi Achim, > > Please, answer to two questions: > > 1) What is the use of VirtualHost + Connectors? > > 2)I need the following: I have pax-web and jetty on port 8080 > (the port is set via org.osgi.service.http.port). And I have two > bundles - A and B with the same web-contextpath: / > Bundle A must be linked to example.com, bundle B to > foo.example.com. Both bundles must be linked to port 8080. > The problem is that if they have the same web-context only > the first bundle is started, the servlets in the second are not > instantiated. Can this be done via existing code? > > Best regards, > > > On 09.10.2016 19:40, 'Achim Nierbeck' via OPS4J wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> hmm I'm not sure, maybe we could get rid of one, but when we started to >> have this feature >> jetty required both paramteres. The newer versions of Jetty only require >> the Web-VirtualHost parameter. >> It's in this method [1]. >> Regarding VirtualHosts and Connectors as far as I'm concerned, it has >> already been implemented. >> BUT I've never been able to verify it fully as I never tried with >> different >> dns names. Only with different ports >> on different connectors. >> That's the part I documented and blogged about. >> Have you tried to verify that this isn't already what you are looking for? >> >> regards, Achim >> >> >> >> [1] - >> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/blob/master/pax-w >> eb-runtime/src/main/java/org/ops4j/pax/web/service/internal/ >> HttpServiceStarted.java#L1136-L1166 >> >> >> 2016-10-09 11:47 GMT+02:00 iJava <pavelkastor...@gmail.com>: >> >> I don't know. If there must be two settings: >>> >>> Web-Connectors: myConnector >>> Web-VirtualHosts: localhost >>> >>> then what is the name of the default connector? >>> Because only with Web-VirtualHosts it doesn't work. >>> >>> I am looking forward to hearing what Achim will say. >>> >>> Best regards, >>> >>> >>> воскресенье, 9 октября 2016 г., 12:31:22 UTC+3 пользователь Niclas >>> Hedhman >>> написал: >>> >>>> >>>> Hold on a sec... Looking at JIRAs and I see; >>>> >>>> https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXWEB-396 >>>> https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXWEB-490 >>>> >>>> Isn't that exactly the same thing? >>>> >>>> Niclas >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 3:34 PM, iJava <pavelka...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>> Niclas, besides look, all current settings are in bundle: >>>>> 1) virtual hosts in bundle jetty-web.xml >>>>> 2) context-path - in bundle manifest >>>>> 3) web.xml - in bundle >>>>> So, I suggest to put it there - let all the settings be in one place - >>>>> in bundle. >>>>> >>>>> воскресенье, 9 октября 2016 г., 9:26:29 UTC+3 пользователь Niclas >>>>> Hedhman написал: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> I would like to suggest that it is not advisable to put the virtual >>>>>> host name into the bundle. That is IMNSHO at odds with the normal >>>>>> flexibility available. I think that one way of doing it is through >>>>>> configuration of Pax Web, such as an optional map of >>>>>> "Bundle-SymbolicName" >>>>>> to "Virtual Host Name". There might be other... >>>>>> >>>>>> Niclas >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sun, Oct 9, 2016 at 11:03 AM, iJava <pavelka...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Achim, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I had some free time (it is 5 am now :) ) to take a look at pax-web >>>>>>> sources. >>>>>>> What I suggest after short analysis is: >>>>>>> 1) The solution must be absolute backward compatible with pax-web >>>>>>> 6.0. >>>>>>> (I need this feature >>>>>>> and I can't wait ? time for version 7.0.0) >>>>>>> 2) In deployed bundles there will be an optional(!) Virtual-Hosts >>>>>>> setting in manifest of war bundle. >>>>>>> I think that even it there is any virtual-host settings separate from >>>>>>> bundles in the future, >>>>>>> it is bundle that must say to which virtual host it wants to belong >>>>>>> to. >>>>>>> 3) We add virtualHosts collection to org.ops4j.pax.web.service.spi. >>>>>>> model.ServerModel >>>>>>> + >>>>>>> fix all match* methods. Besides we fix match* in >>>>>>> JettyServerHandlerCollection >>>>>>> 4) it is necessary to allow war bundles with the same context if the >>>>>>> have virtual-hosts setting. >>>>>>> I haven't looked yet where it can be done. >>>>>>> 5) The suggested solution is a "first attempt" to see how it will be >>>>>>> like and will not >>>>>>> require much time (which is the problem #1). If someone has time in >>>>>>> future he\she can >>>>>>> always make the solution better. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What will you say? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> P.S. I considered only for jetty as I wrote above. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> понедельник, 3 октября 2016 г., 21:43:15 UTC+3 пользователь Achim >>>>>>> Nierbeck написал: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Niclas ... I have no clue why he isn't shown ... according to >>>>>>>> openhub.net he still is [1] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Pavel, one could also always have 15 Microservices taking care of >>>>>>>> those 15 domains. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> regards, Achim >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [1] - https://www.openhub.net/p/pax-web/users >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> 2016-10-03 6:54 GMT+02:00 Pavel Kastornyy <pavelka...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Hi Marc >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> You are absolutely right - it is possible to use frontend server >>>>>>>>> and use pax-web as backend server. But in this case pax-web >>>>>>>>> in any serious production use can be used only as backend + >>>>>>>>> if you have 15 domains you will manage 15 ports. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On 02.10.2016 21:46, Marc Schlegel wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Here are my two cents >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Regarding the whiteboard-extender, I was actually thinking of >>>>>>>>>> moving this >>>>>>>>>> into the webcontainer, because due to the whiteboard-dto spec >>>>>>>>>> those >>>>>>>>>> two are >>>>>>>>>> closely related anyways. My idea was to deprecate the (upcoming) >>>>>>>>>> WhiteboardManager-service right away in order to merge those two >>>>>>>>>> modules in >>>>>>>>>> a 7.0 release. So that might solve one pain-point. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> But another question is: do we need to rewrite everything in order >>>>>>>>>> to get a >>>>>>>>>> feature which might no be needed? Without knowing the >>>>>>>>>> business-case >>>>>>>>>> behind >>>>>>>>>> registering multiple contexts with the same name in different >>>>>>>>>> virtual-hosts, I still think that there are much cheaper >>>>>>>>>> alternatives: >>>>>>>>>> everything today moves away from heavy-installations (AppServers) >>>>>>>>>> in favor >>>>>>>>>> of dedicated containers. With OSGi and Pax-Web you can easily >>>>>>>>>> spawn >>>>>>>>>> multiple VMs, and have some proxy/webserver in front which manages >>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>> site/domain to look like one. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> regards >>>>>>>>>> Marc >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Am Sonntag, 2. Oktober 2016 15:39:45 UTC+2 schrieb iJava: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hi Achim >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Could you say (from the top of your head) approximatively how >>>>>>>>>>> many >>>>>>>>>>> hours >>>>>>>>>>> may these changes need - 100/1000/5000/10000? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> воскресенье, 2 октября 2016 г., 15:40:23 UTC+3 пользователь Achim >>>>>>>>>>> Nierbeck >>>>>>>>>>> написал: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Sounds like a good and interesting idea ... >>>>>>>>>>>> Right now only from the top of my head: >>>>>>>>>>>> The Pax-Web Runtime and therefore the different Implementations >>>>>>>>>>>> aren't >>>>>>>>>>>> made for this right now. So this would need a complete rewrite >>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>> how we're >>>>>>>>>>>> handling it. Another point would be how would web and >>>>>>>>>>>> white-board >>>>>>>>>>>> extender >>>>>>>>>>>> work with it. We could think about wiring those two closer to >>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>> core. >>>>>>>>>>>> Never the less an application deploying servlets will always >>>>>>>>>>>> need >>>>>>>>>>>> to add >>>>>>>>>>>> the virtual host environment, working with defaults could take >>>>>>>>>>>> care of that. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> We could consider to start this with a complete rewrite of >>>>>>>>>>>> Pax-Web and >>>>>>>>>>>> therefore aim for a 7.0. >>>>>>>>>>>> BUT ... I fear I won't have enough time to takle this. >>>>>>>>>>>> Considering the >>>>>>>>>>>> amount of time I spent in the past and about what it would take >>>>>>>>>>>> to have all >>>>>>>>>>>> the functionalities of Pax-Web re-written, and especially with >>>>>>>>>>>> my >>>>>>>>>>>> $dayJob + >>>>>>>>>>>> Family. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> regards, Achim >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-10-02 5:35 GMT+02:00 Niclas Hedhman <nic...@hedhman.org>: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Honestly, if this is to be fixed, I think Pax Web should support >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Managed >>>>>>>>>>>>> Service Factory, and instantiate separate virtual host services >>>>>>>>>>>>> according >>>>>>>>>>>>> to a provided configuration. That configuration should contain >>>>>>>>>>>>> which WAB(s) >>>>>>>>>>>>> goes into that virtual host, together with any other virtual >>>>>>>>>>>>> host >>>>>>>>>>>>> configuration. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> To me, that seems to be the right solution forward, maintains >>>>>>>>>>>>> OSGi >>>>>>>>>>>>> compatibility, doesn't introduce new config args on WABs and >>>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't treat >>>>>>>>>>>>> "one domain" different than another. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I think the tricky bit is to make the default case and the MSF >>>>>>>>>>>>> instantiations play nicely with each other, but that is an >>>>>>>>>>>>> design >>>>>>>>>>>>> implementation detail at this stage. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers >>>>>>>>>>>>> Niclas >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Oct 1, 2016 at 4:49 PM, iJava <pavelka...@gmail.com> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I analyzed situation again and I am sure I am right. How I >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> explain this >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - if *only* >>>>>>>>>>>>>> web-contextpath is used then all war bundles (wabs) are inside >>>>>>>>>>>>>> one >>>>>>>>>>>>>> domain. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Obvious if you need more then one domains (virtualhosts) this >>>>>>>>>>>>>> limitation is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> unpleasant. So I am sure that when bundle is deployed it must >>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>> *two* >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> settings: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Layer one - virtualhosts (plural) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Layer two - web-contextpath. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> In this case the deployer has all the advantages. He can >>>>>>>>>>>>>> create >>>>>>>>>>>>>> N sites >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And inside every virtualhost he can make N contexts if he >>>>>>>>>>>>>> needs. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am sure that this functionality must be developed. Pax-web >>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>> great >>>>>>>>>>>>>> product >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and with such functionality it will have all main >>>>>>>>>>>>>> functionality >>>>>>>>>>>>>> of a >>>>>>>>>>>>>> good web server. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would be glad to hear others opinion about such New Feature. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> пятница, 30 сентября 2016 г., 18:14:33 UTC+3 пользователь >>>>>>>>>>>>>> iJava >>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ok Achim. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I understood the situation. You know the architecture of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pax-web well. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could you say - how difficult >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it can be to make some extender (plugin etc) to link wabs not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> web-contextpath but to virtualhosts >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and to make them all work with one port like it is in usual >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> web >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> servers (for example apache). >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please, note I don't care about specification - I care about >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> normal >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пятница, 30 сентября 2016 г., 18:06:23 UTC+3 пользователь >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Achim >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nierbeck написал: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I never said Pax-Web is a complete replacement for GlassFish, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it's a WebContainer for OSGi environments, which fulfills >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OSGi >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> spec. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It uses Jetty, Undertow or Tomcat to do so. AND it gives you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> most of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the benefits of those underlying servers in the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> same way. If you're not satisfied because you expect >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> something >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different. I'm sorry to hear >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> but nothing we can do about. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regards, Achim >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-09-30 17:04 GMT+02:00 Achim Nierbeck < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bcan...@googlemail.com>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Well, in that case try to use GlassFish again. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GlassFish uses a complete different strategy. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards, Achim >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-09-30 17:02 GMT+02:00 iJava <pavelka...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Something is wrong here. I worked with glassfish. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Everything >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> starts >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with glassfish domain. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In one domain you usually have one http connector and one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> connector. After that in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one domain you can have multiple virtual hosts. When you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> deploy >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> osgi bundle you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in manifest have Web-ContextPath and VirtualServers. So >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> you >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> can >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have N sites >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (example.com, boo.org, blablabla.net) with WebContextPath >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> / and it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not necessary >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to create new connectors for new ports. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I know it well, because I remember it took me some time to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> make it >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> work. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And I was very glad because it is easy to work with one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> port then >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with N. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now you suggest me to go back and again work with N ports. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> shocked and killed. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пятница, 30 сентября 2016 г., 17:49:30 UTC+3 пользователь >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Achim >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nierbeck написал: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> yes, you can only have one Web-ContextPath per WAB. "/" >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> especially tricky since you can also have HttpService >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> servlets listening on >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> that one. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regards, Achim >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-09-30 16:46 GMT+02:00 iJava <pavelka...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Achim >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you for the links, I wil study them now. So, do I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> understand it right - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> accroding to specs I can have only one bundle with >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> web-contextpath / for one port ? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пятница, 30 сентября 2016 г., 17:37:55 UTC+3 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пользователь >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Achim >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Nierbeck написал: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It's in the spec ... >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Now, if you want to run virtual hosts, take a look at >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the links >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> below. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regards, Achim >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ops4j/org.o >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ps4j.pax.web/blob/master/pax-w >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eb-itest/pax-web-itest-contain >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> er/pax-web-itest-container- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jetty/src/test/java/org/ops4j/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pax/web/itest/jetty/JettyConfi >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gurationExtendedIntegrationTest.java >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/ops4j/org.o >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ps4j.pax.web/blob/master/pax-w >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> eb-itest/pax-web-itest-contain >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> er/pax-web-itest-container- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jetty/src/test/java/org/ops4j/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pax/web/itest/jetty/JettyConfi >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> gurationExtendedTwoIntegrationTest.java >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/2 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 013/01/bind-certain-web-applic >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ations-to-specific-httpconnectors/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-09-30 16:23 GMT+02:00 Pavel Kastornyy < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pavelka...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Achim, I understand you, but why? If the domains are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> different >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> why must I change web-contextpath? For example, lets >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> suppose >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I have five different sites on one osgi and for every >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> site I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> separate wab (which is logical) and every wab has only >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> context >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - /. It is normal situation - take a look at any web >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> server. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 30.09.2016 17:19, 'Achim Nierbeck' via OPS4J wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The Manifest entry Web-ContextPath is the one in >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> charge >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> where the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> application resides in. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So in that case you need to make sure of different >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Web-ContextPaths. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regards, Achim >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-09-30 16:09 GMT+02:00 iJava < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pavelka...@gmail.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Achim, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, you are right. The same web-contextpath in both >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bundles: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> / >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But it seems to be a bug because in bundle A I have >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> jetty-web.xml >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <Configure >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> class="org.eclipse.jetty.servl >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> et.ServletContextHandler"> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <Set name="virtualHosts"> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <Array type="java.lang.String"> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <Item>example.com</Item> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <Item>www.example.com</Item> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </Array> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </Set> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </Configure> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and in bundle B I have jetty-web.xml >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <Configure >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> class="org.eclipse.jetty.servl >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> et.ServletContextHandler"> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <Set name="virtualHosts"> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <Array type="java.lang.String"> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <Item>foo.example.com</Item> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <Item>www.foo.example.com</Item> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </Array> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </Set> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> </Configure> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пятница, 30 сентября 2016 г., 16:54:24 UTC+3 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> пользователь >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Achim Nierbeck >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> написал: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> this seems to be a rather strange bug. Do both of >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the war >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> maybe have the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> same web-contextpath? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> regards, Achim >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2016-09-30 14:09 GMT+02:00 iJava < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> pavelka...@gmail.com>: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi all >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It may seem to be funny question but I have the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> following >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> situation. I >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have two war bundles A and B. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When I start and install only bundle A - it works >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ok. When >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I start and >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> install only bundle B it works ok. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> When I try to install both of them always only the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> first >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> works. The >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> servlet in the second bundle is not >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instantiated. I tried to add >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <load-on-startup>0</load-on-startup> to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> servlet config >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in web.xml but it didn't help. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Any ideas? Does anyone try to deploy more then one >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> war >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> bundle on the same >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> osgi framework with pax-web 6.0? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Best regards, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> op...@googlegroups.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> emails >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from it, send >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Member >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> & >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PMC >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /paxweb/Pax+Web/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Committer >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> & Project Lead >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> op...@googlegroups.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> emails from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- You received this message because you are >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> emails from >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> it, send an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/op >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tout. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Member >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PMC >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /paxweb/Pax+Web/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Committer & Project Lead >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from it, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> send an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/op >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tout. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Member >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /paxweb/Pax+Web/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Committer & Project Lead >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from it, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> send an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/op >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> tout. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Member >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /paxweb/Pax+Web/ >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Committer & Project Lead >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Member >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> /paxweb/Pax+Web/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Committer & Project Lead >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Google >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from >>>>>>>>>>>>>> it, send >>>>>>>>>>>>>> an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> --- >>>>>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>>>>>> Google >>>>>>>>>>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from >>>>>>>>>>>>> it, send >>>>>>>>>>>>> an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Member >>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC >>>>>>>>>>>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> >>>>>>>>>>>> Committer >>>>>>>>>>>> & Project Lead >>>>>>>>>>>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> >>>>>>>>>>>> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the >>>>>>>>> Google Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>>>> send an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Apache Member >>>>>>>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC >>>>>>>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> >>>>>>>> Committer & Project Lead >>>>>>>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> >>>>>>>> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> ------------------ >>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --- >>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, >>>>>>> send >>>>>>> an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer >>>>>> http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>> -- >>>>> ------------------ >>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - op...@googlegroups.com >>>>> >>>>> --- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to ops4j+un...@googlegroups.com. >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer >>>> http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java >>>> >>>> -- >>> -- >>> ------------------ >>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com >>> >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >>> "OPS4J" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >>> email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >>> >> >> > -- > -- > ------------------ > OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com > > --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "OPS4J" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Apache Member Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/> Committer & Project Lead blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master -- -- ------------------ OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - ops4j@googlegroups.com --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "OPS4J" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ops4j+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
