Hello

I see https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/pull/215 is already merged
to master, which didn't have any release yet. However
https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXWEB-1180 is set to be fixed in 7.2.3.

Kal - what's the version you want to have released?

regards
Grzegorz Grzybek

pt., 5 paź 2018 o 06:12 Grzegorz Grzybek <[email protected]> napisał(a):

> Hello
>
> What version (branch) do you want to get released? I'll review your PR
> again - the only problem I see is that changed interfaces will require
> bumping not micro (3rd), but minor (2nd) digit in the version. Maybe
> there's a way to have this implemented without adding new interface methods?
>
> regards
> Grzegorz Grzybek
>
> czw., 4 paź 2018 o 21:24 <[email protected]> napisał(a):
>
>> I mentioned this on my PR but also wanted to mention here if it was
>> missed.
>>
>> When is the next pax web release planned for? If it can happen so we
>> don't have to keep our own fork release I'd appreciate it.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> Kal Cramer
>>
>>
>> On Tuesday, October 2, 2018 at 8:07:32 AM UTC-7, [email protected]
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Yeah, Intelij was acting up... changed settings and removed all
>>> whitespace changes from PR.
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Kal Cramer
>>>
>>> On Monday, October 1, 2018 at 11:10:16 PM UTC-7, Grzegorz Grzybek wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hello Kal
>>>>
>>>> I see your PR contains lots of extra changes that do not do anything
>>>> (like changing tabs to spaces, etc.) While reformatting code is not a bad
>>>> thing, I'd like not to mix such changes with "real" changes. It hurts (how
>>>> I call it) "cherrypickability" badly...
>>>>
>>>> Also, changing exported Interfaces require bumping at least minor (2nd)
>>>> digit in version number according to semantic versioning. Please review
>>>> https://github.com/ops4j/org.ops4j.pax.web/pull/215/files and remove
>>>> all the changes that are format-related only.
>>>>
>>>> best regards
>>>> Grzegorz Grzybek
>>>>
>>>> pon., 1 paź 2018 o 18:12 <[email protected]> napisał(a):
>>>>
>>>>> Link to task, let me know if design is acceptable:
>>>>> https://ops4j1.jira.com/browse/PAXWEB-1180
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sunday, September 30, 2018 at 4:26:12 AM UTC-7, Achim Nierbeck
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Done.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am Sa., 29. Sep. 2018 um 12:12 Uhr schrieb Grzegorz Grzybek <
>>>>>> [email protected]>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Achim - I don't think I can add people to groups in PAXWEB - could
>>>>>>> you please look at it? Or add Kal Cramer to relevant groups?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Kal - yes - the configuration was designed that factory PID is per
>>>>>>> bundle, i.e. 1:1 factoryPid : symbolic name. That was all that was
>>>>>>> anticipated initially. If you have idea to enhance this configuration, 
>>>>>>> I'd
>>>>>>> be happy to review your PR.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks and best regards
>>>>>>> Grzegorz Grzybek
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> pt., 28 wrz 2018 o 23:37 <[email protected]> napisał(a):
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'll plan on making the necessary changes in a fork and create a PR
>>>>>>>> if this seems reasonable. If I can get added to the JIRA I can create 
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> ticket and such.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -Kal Cramer
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Wednesday, September 26, 2018 at 10:32:08 AM UTC-7,
>>>>>>>> [email protected] wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hello!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Based on what I see in:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://ops4j1.jira.com/wiki/spaces/paxweb/pages/354025473/HTTP+Context+processing
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The authMethod and realmName must be defined on a per bundle basis
>>>>>>>>> within the corresponding web.xml. I was wondering if there's a
>>>>>>>>> configuration that's possible right now to define a default it for all
>>>>>>>>> bundles?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I would like to configure this for all existing and new bundles
>>>>>>>>> that are added to my project.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thank you in advance,
>>>>>>>>> Kal Cramer
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> ------------------
>>>>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected]
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group.
>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Apache Member
>>>>>> Apache Karaf <http://karaf.apache.org/> Committer & PMC
>>>>>> OPS4J Pax Web <http://wiki.ops4j.org/display/paxweb/Pax+Web/>
>>>>>> Committer & Project Lead
>>>>>> blog <http://notizblog.nierbeck.de/>
>>>>>> Co-Author of Apache Karaf Cookbook <http://bit.ly/1ps9rkS>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Software Architect / Project Manager / Scrum Master
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>> --
>>>>> ------------------
>>>>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected]
>>>>>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "OPS4J" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>
>>>> --
>> --
>> ------------------
>> OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected]
>>
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "OPS4J" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>

-- 
-- 
------------------
OPS4J - http://www.ops4j.org - [email protected]

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"OPS4J" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to