Melinda Shore <[email protected]> writes: >> This approach would not require any standardization effort at all, >> just the effort to write the supplemental MIB module and to >> implement the object(s) in it. If the IETF community has low >> interest in standardizing the extension you are asking for, then >> this is probably the right way to go. > > I think that's probably the case - I haven't seen anybody else > express interest or support, although the discussion so far has > really focused on how to get it done if it's decided that it > should be.
FYI, I support the standardization of additional objects to the HR mib. There are a number of requests I've heard over time that have needed to add additions to the HR mib, and this is really just one of a few. -- Wes Hardaker SPARTA, Inc. _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
