On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 09:51:42AM +0100, t.petch wrote: > If change is to be made, I would like it to be an updated, Standards > track MIB module, rather than a patch of any shape or form. I would be > happy to help with the reviewing of it. I am a user of the HR MIB module > rather than implementer. >
Same here. What I heard so far and what I consider useful as well: - Updates to add high capacity counters that are needed for todays storage and memory sizes. - Additional counters that deal with the notion of reserved space in various file systems. - Some boot parameters limitations. - We may want to extend hrDiskStorageMedia or even make it IANA controlled. - Perhaps it makes sense to add hrSWRunPerfVirtualMem since hrSWRunPerfMem seems to report only the resident memory of a process. Perhaps it also makes sense to add hrSWRunPerfSharedMem. - And of course, having a common notion of system load averages would be useful since this is something we always have to dig out of proprietary MIBs. Anyway, I am planning to add support for any of these to the scli program once there is an agent supporting these extensions I can test against. /js -- Juergen Schoenwaelder Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH Phone: +49 421 200 3587 Campus Ring 1, 28759 Bremen, Germany Fax: +49 421 200 3103 <http://www.jacobs-university.de/> _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
