"Randy Presuhn" <[email protected]> writes: > This discussion has thus far not touched on (1) at all, and I note that > the folks who I know were most visible in Host-Resources-MIB > implementations have been conspicuously absent from this discussion. > Without some interest in (1), or at least some assurance that the > major code bases might get updated, the main value of a document > would be to describe the shortcoming and other possible operational > workarounds, if they exist.
Speaking with my vendor hat on: Net-SNMP would almost certainly add support for them. -- Wes Hardaker SPARTA, Inc. _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
