On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 09:52:43 -0700 Wes wrote: WH> Melinda Shore <[email protected]> writes: WH> > I think that's probably the case - I haven't seen anybody else WH> > express interest or support, although the discussion so far has WH> > really focused on how to get it done if it's decided that it WH> > should be. WH> WH> FYI, I support the standardization of additional objects to the HR mib.
+1 WH> There are a number of requests I've heard over time that have needed to WH> add additions to the HR mib, and this is really just one of a few. Yep, I had the same though. If we're going to do this, digging up those and doing them at the same time would make sense. Robert -- Senior Software Engineer SPARTA, Inc., a Parsons Company
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
