I am not sure, how to resolve this comment. Please give advice. Juergen Schoenwaelder schrieb am 20.02.2015 um 17:49: > - The comment behind LAST-UPDATED is wrong (this happens once > there is redundant information)
Shouldn't the dates specified in LAST-UPDATED and REVISION be the publication date of the RFC? In this case, I would need to add place holders with comments for the RFC Ed to replace them with the publication date. Or should these dates be set to the date when the MIB was finally prepared (neglecting editorial changes by the RFC Ed? -- Johannes _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
