On 2/8/2018 6:04 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for
draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt-17: Discuss
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-mm-wg-effect-encrypt/
----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
I have completely re-reviewed the latest version. First, I want to
thank you for toning down some of the material that I was concerned
about.
Unfortunately, the fundamental concern that motivated my DISCUSS
remains: I do not believe that this document matches the consensus
of the IETF community.
That's an interesting claim.
If the process has not been followed, this requires facts as opposed to
"believes".
We should make sure to make a distinction between the IETF community
views and your own views.
Regards, Benoit
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
