> On Feb 8, 2018, at 5:17 AM, Randy Bush <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> Unfortunately, the fundamental concern that motivated my DISCUSS >>> remains: I do not believe that this document matches the consensus >>> of the IETF community. >> That's an interesting claim. >> If the process has not been followed, this requires facts as opposed >> to "believes". >> We should make sure to make a distinction between the IETF community >> views and your own views.
Eric: I’m also interested in understanding your claim regarding consensus — can you please expand? > > 1984 7258 " Making networks unmanageable to mitigate PM is not an acceptable outcome, but ignoring PM would go against the consensus documented here. An appropriate balance will emerge over time as real instances of this tension are considered.” > 7625 ... and dogged comments on this draft; though some of us > have grew a bit weary of the denial game and allowed ourselves to be > shut up. Or a DDoS against the ideas on this document? > > randy > — Carlos Pignataro, [email protected] “Sometimes I use big words that I do not fully understand, to make myself sound more photosynthesis.” > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
