> On Feb 8, 2018, at 5:17 AM, Randy Bush <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>>> Unfortunately, the fundamental concern that motivated my DISCUSS
>>> remains: I do not believe that this document matches the consensus
>>> of the IETF community.
>> That's an interesting claim.
>> If the process has not been followed, this requires facts as opposed
>> to "believes".
>> We should make sure to make a distinction between the IETF community
>> views and your own views.

Eric: I’m also interested in understanding your claim regarding consensus — can 
you please expand?

> 
> 1984 7258

"  Making
   networks unmanageable to mitigate PM is not an acceptable outcome,
   but ignoring PM would go against the consensus documented here.  An
   appropriate balance will emerge over time as real instances of this
   tension are considered.”

> 7625 ... and dogged comments on this draft; though some of us
> have grew a bit weary of the denial game and allowed ourselves to be
> shut up.

Or a DDoS against the ideas on this document?

> 
> randy
> 

—
Carlos Pignataro, [email protected]

“Sometimes I use big words that I do not fully understand, to make myself sound 
more photosynthesis.”


> _______________________________________________
> OPSAWG mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to