>> Unfortunately, the fundamental concern that motivated my DISCUSS >> remains: I do not believe that this document matches the consensus >> of the IETF community. > That's an interesting claim. > If the process has not been followed, this requires facts as opposed > to "believes". > We should make sure to make a distinction between the IETF community > views and your own views.
1984 7258 7625 ... and dogged comments on this draft; though some of us have grew a bit weary of the denial game and allowed ourselves to be shut up. randy _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
