On 2020-11-11, at 19:13, Toerless Eckert <[email protected]> wrote: > > Agreed. but this is in contradiction to what others here on the thread claimed > would be in scope of changes toward RFC, such as "anything", so everybody > seems > to chime in wih liking pcapng without first trying to have a clear > understanding > what it is the WG should and should not do.
Well, it’s not really a contradiction if: (1) the IETF is allowed to do X (2) it would be stupid to do X (Obviously, a handover would include reaching some trust that the IETF would not be doing stupid things, so the boundary may be a bit more murky.) Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
