Toerless Eckert <[email protected]> wrote: >> Toerless Eckert <[email protected]> wrote: >> > I am mostly worried to figure out if we can try to lock in the admissable changes to >> > the document as early as possible. >> >> You can change anything you want as long as a 2018-era release of wireshark >> and tcpdump can read the result.
> Right. thats a good cutoff point. But that was not my discussion point:
> My discussion point is that i want to prohibit IETF/IESG review later on
to force
> for whatever reasons changes to the doc that would violate your cutoff
point - by
> pointing to "this document was accepted to OPSAWG under exactly the aboe
condition,
> violating it would render the document useless. Please reserve your
suggestions
> for improvement for followup work".
Probably, when the adoption call occurs, your suggestion/review for text
explaining the history of the document would be really really welcome.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
