On 2020-11-11, at 19:13, Toerless Eckert <[email protected]> wrote: > > Kidding aside: Maybe the relevant discuss for the fdt mailing list would be > if we should have/select a formal language to describe the arbitrary binary > TLV format that we may just inherit and can not be replaced by any of the > non-arbitrary encoding options (such as CBOR). Ideally, the formal > description could automatically generate ASCII art renderings too for human > enjoyment.
"Describing Protocol Data Units with Augmented Packet Header Diagrams", Stephen McQuistin, Vivian Band, Dejice Jacob, Colin Perkins, 2020-11-02, <draft-mcquistin-augmented-ascii-diagrams-07.txt> takes the inverse approach. Please discuss over at [email protected]. Grüße, Carsten _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
