Hi all,
This version addresses all the comments raised in my previous review of the
document. I have only very few comments:
* Section โ5.9. srhActiveSegmentIPv6Typeโ: please add the pointer to the
IANA registry under โAdditional Informationโ.
* Section 6.3:
* Is there any SPRING document that explains the motivation for having
more than one SRH?
* Please reword these two sentences:
OLD:
[RFC8200] describes the support of multiple extension headers in one
IPv6 packet. Allowing the use of multiple SRH per SRv6 packet.
* Iโm afraid the SHOULD normative language for the ordering is not
required as it is redundant (?) with this part from RFC7011:
If an Information Element is required more than once in a Template,
the different occurrences of this Information Element SHOULD follow
the logical order of their treatments by the Metering Process.
* What is an โactive SRHโ?
I support advancing this spec assuming these comments are addressed. Thanks.
Cheers,
Med
De : OPSAWG <opsawg-boun...@ietf.org> De la part de Joe Clarke (jclarke)
Envoyรฉ : mercredi 30 novembre 2022 14:54
ร : opsawg@ietf.org
Objet : [OPSAWG] ๐ WG LC: Export of Segment Routing over IPv6 Information in IP
Flow Information Export (IPFIX)
Hello, WG. As discussed at IETF 115, we want to conduct a WG LC for
draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh. The authors believe this work is stable and
moreover used the 115 hackathon to develop a interoperable implementations
(linked in Data Tracker) . Additionally, IANA has already weighed in on this
work and agree with the considerations approach.
Therefore, we are calling for a two week LC. We will conclude on December 14.
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh/
Please review the current -04 draft, post your comments and/or your thoughts on
the current text.
Thanks.
Joe
_________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations
confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc
pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu ce
message par erreur, veuillez le signaler
a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages
electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration,
Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou
falsifie. Merci.
This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged
information that may be protected by law;
they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete
this message and its attachments.
As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been
modified, changed or falsified.
Thank you.
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
OPSAWG@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
