Dear OPSAWG,

I support the WGLC for this document and believe it’s an important extension to 
IPFIX to address the emerging SRv6 use case. Thanks!

Haoyu

From: OPSAWG <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> On 
Behalf Of Joe Clarke (jclarke)
Sent: Wednesday, November 30, 2022 2:54 PM
To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
Subject: [OPSAWG] πŸ”” WG LC: Export of Segment Routing over IPv6 Information in 
IP Flow Information Export (IPFIX)

Hello, WG.  As discussed at IETF 115, we want to conduct a WG LC for 
draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh.  The authors believe this work is stable and 
moreover used the 115 hackathon to develop a interoperable implementations 
(linked in Data Tracker) .  Additionally, IANA has already weighed in on this 
work and agree with the considerations approach.

Therefore, we are calling for a two week LC.  We will conclude on December 14.

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh/<https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fdatatracker.ietf.org%2Fdoc%2Fdraft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh%2F&data=05%7C01%7Chaoyu.song%40futurewei.com%7C5c5c5627246f4610ab5e08dad36629d7%7C0fee8ff2a3b240189c753a1d5591fedc%7C1%7C1%7C638054733003456300%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C2000%7C%7C%7C&sdata=nsk7XxPsEKN2e53mwRRaDCrBYm9dFiXlPup%2BcytxHnA%3D&reserved=0>

Please review the current -04 draft, post your comments and/or your thoughts on 
the current text.

Thanks.

Joe
_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to