Dear OPSAWG, As a contributor, I believe this work is ready and necessary for SRv6 networks. I support the WG LC.
Regards, Alex > On 30 Nov 2022, at 14:53, Joe Clarke (jclarke) > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, WG. As discussed at IETF 115, we want to conduct a WG LC for > draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh. The authors believe this work is stable > and moreover used the 115 hackathon to develop a interoperable > implementations (linked in Data Tracker) . Additionally, IANA has already > weighed in on this work and agree with the considerations approach. > > Therefore, we are calling for a two week LC. We will conclude on December 14. > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh/ > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ipfix-srv6-srh/> > > Please review the current -04 draft, post your comments and/or your thoughts > on the current text. > > Thanks. > > Joe > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg > <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg>
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
