this is exactly my point.

It would have been better to give your developer
"truncate" only privileges, and that too only on a few
tables... but NEVER the Oracle schema owner password!
NEVER.

But, you too gave it away! you too Brutus!  Even
though you are quite averse to doing so.

Think about it, this happens everyday.  Whether you
like it or not, you have MASTER, TEST, PRODUCTION,
DEVELOPMENT, STAGING... instances, and your schema
passwords are floating around, and you have no
control.  And, you promise that you will never give
the schema password out ever again, but you know you
will...  you will be forced to... your director will
make you... and if you fight it any win, your
developer productivity will be seriously compromised.

You need to have a means of giving the schema access
without giving away the full house.  And the solution
is NOT via a read-only user.  A read-only user is
useless.  You cannot do any serious work in a read
only user. Been there done that.  Giving Oracle
privileges, to users, as a case-by-case request, is
IMPOSSIBLE for you to manage, UNREASONABLE and NOT
FEASIBLE.  

Anyway, NEVER give the ORACLE PASSWORD away.  Only
encrypted access.  And, let Dom Phoc work right in the
owner schema.  There will be no problem, if you can
GUARANTEE limited access, full audits on everything
Dom does via this access, including select statements.
 Dom Phoc will not be viewing the Salaries, and Credit
Card numbers now... not if its being audited.  

At the expense of sounding like a sales person, let me
point this out again for the benefit of the group:
And, you certainly need to look at it:
http://www.iraje.com/docs/ActiveSecureDesigner.htm

I will find forward you some more info.

Keith



Date: Sun, 05 May 2002 03:48:18 -0800 
To: "Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Organization: Fat City Network Services, San Diego,
California 
 
         
Well , just to keep things jumping.

Last week I deviated from our rule and gave a
responsible user 
that needed truncate on tables the password for the
owner of the 
schema.

Guess what? Today he comes to me to recreate 2 tables
that he dropped.

Go figure.

Yechiel Adar
Mehish

----- Original Message ----- 
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 5:53 PM


> Yechiel,
> Yes, I have been there, done that, over and over...
> But then, there is a "Toyota Corolla" solution and
> maybe a "Ferrari Testarosa" solution.
> 
> If we can control "Dom Phoc" without tieing his
hands
> behind the back, wouldn't that would be the best:
> white paper:
> http://www.iraje.com/docs/ActiveSecureDesigner.htm
> 
> 
> Keith
> 
> 
> Date: Thu, 02 May 2002 11:48:38 -0800
> To: "Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Organization: Fat City Network Services, San Diego,
> California
> 
> 
> 
> Well Keith
> 
> Our solution to the <Doom Phoc (and their siblings)>
> is:
> 
> Do not grant they rights to do any DDL either in
test
> nor in prod.
> 
> The dab stuff does all the DDL work.
> Sure it is an added chore, but after tracking down,
a
> few times, tables
> that
> were dropped
> inadvertently by users (their tool did it by itself)
> we now use the
> following policy:
> 
> Every application has two user id's:
> Owner, with password known only to the DBA group.
> User with rights for select, insert, update, delete
> ONLY.
> 
> It works.
> 
> Yechiel Adar
> Mehish
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 7:54 PM
> 
> 
> > Lisa,
> > There is only so much you can control via a model,
> > since it remains a process away from the DB, and
> > cannot be enforced via privileges, etc.  So, we
are
> > always in the hands of Dom Phoc (and their
> siblings),
> > who can do "stuff" even in the production database
> > with SQLPLus/TOAD/...  Under this schenario, do
you
> > sleep well at night?
> >
> > So, we said lets work with our Dom Phoc's.  On
> > production databases, we will STRIP them off of
the
> > Oracle database passwords.  No password, no
change.
> > ENFORCED!  Now, I can sleep well at night.
> >
> > How? Not via models.  Via a solution involving the
> > following, and it seems to be working for us well:
> >
ActiveDesigner/ActiveChangeManager/ActiveCompare/A+
> > White Paper:
> > http://www.iraje.com/docs/ActiveSecureDesigner.htm
> >
> > Take charge of the "Dom Phocs" in your org!
> >
> > Keith
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: Wed, 1 May 2002 16:06:00 -0500
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Well, for one thing, if your developer, Dom Phoc,
> > starts changing crap
> > in
> > your database (as has happened to me in the past)
a
> > compare to the dev
> > model
> > would be great because my development changes
would
> be
> > in the model,
> > not in
> > the test or production databases.  In that
specific
> > case I had to TRUST
> > him
> > (what?  trust him after what he just did?) to
change
> > everything back,
> > or
> > restore from a backup, which would have been very
> time
> > consuming.
> >
> > I was one large ball of raging hormones that day
and
> I
> > took it all out
> > on
> > him.  We don't work on the same projects anymore.
> >
> > Lisa Koivu
> > Oracle Database Administrator
> > Fairfield Resorts, Inc.
> > 5259 Coconut Creek Parkway
> > Ft. Lauderdale, FL, USA  33063
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Keith Peterson [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 01, 2002 5:50 PM
> > > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
> > > Subject: RE: ERD generation tool - Active
> > Comparisons
> > >
> > > Am I speaking to the wind ....
> > >
> > > For Compares, why would you compare the MODEL
with
> > the
> > > DATABASE...like going from US to London via
> Tokyo...
> > > ... and you get to pay more, like... you pay not
> for
> > > distance, but for "time in the air"... If a tool
> > takes
> > > longer to do something, makes more mistakes, is
> > bumpy
> > > and complex... you get to pay more.
> > >
> > > For compares, someone tell me what beats
> > > ActiveCompare:
> > > http://www.iraje.com/compare-diff.htm
> > >
> > > http://www.iraje.com/ActiveCompare_viewlet.html
> > >
> > >
> > > ...and I will switch my tool.
> > >
> > > Keith



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - your guide to health and wellness
http://health.yahoo.com
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Keith Peterson
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Reply via email to