Yechiel - But all things are NEVER equal. So companies end up doing stupid
things because of some larger motive. You end up buying crappy computers
because your boss thinks it will impress the CEO with how you are loyally
supporting someone that somehow supports your company.
Ironic isn't it. When the PC industry began, the computer industry was
firmly dominated by IBM. PC enthusiasts were a bunch of starry-eyed dreamers
that though they could wrestle computing away from the computer priesthood
and bring freedom to everyman. In many ways the Internet has made that dream
come true. But then we have Microsoft talking about creating a new security
system for my computer that on one hand will protect me from bad things and
on the other hand will protect the products of large corporations from me.
In a great number of ways Microsoft resembles the IBM of the past.
<obligatory Oracle reference>
Of course Larry Ellison only wishes he had these type of issues to
deal with.
</obligatory Oracle reference>
Dennis Williams
DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 8:43 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
What exactly is your problem?
Lets say that you are a factory that sells paper.
You need to buy a computer system.
One supplier also sell printers and the other advocate paperless office.
All things being equal, which one will you give your business to??
Yechiel Adar
Mehish
----- Original Message -----
To: Multiple <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> recipients of list ORACLE-L
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 1:13 AM
This came to our DBA team today. I'd appreciate your thoughts. I'm not
a business
guy, just a plain old Apps DBA, but this really pisses me off. Is it
common practice
by MS?
It is important from an Architecture point of view that we
understand all the various approaches to "web services" (also known as "grid
computing" -- see my recent report). Microsoft's dot Net initiative is
their approach to this grand overarching software strategy.
There is a second reason why we might be interested specifically in
dot Net. Subsidiary XYZ earns $xyz a year for us from
Microsoft by [performing certain services], etc. Microsoft has told
our management that one of their criteria for evaluating their vendors will
be how good of a MS customer is the potential vendor. Specifically, has the
vendor bought in to the dot Net strategy. Now we aren't going to make our
global enterprise solutions strategy decisions based upon that point alone,
but it's not something we are going to ignore either.
Therefore, I support investigating SQL server, Biz Talk, and dot
Net, but I emphasize the word INVESTIGATING.
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: DENNIS WILLIAMS
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
