On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 8:07 AM, Robert J. Lang <[email protected]> wrote: > > In the same > way, OrigamiUSA had to decide whether forgoing the additional sales that > might accrue if PayPal were accepted was worth the higher fees that PayPal > charges.
Setting aside the snark-exchange, how much higher are the fees for PayPal than the current method of credit card payment? Is this the essence of "the case" for not supporting it at The Source? Is there a significant setup/recurring charge for PayPal on top of the percentage of the sale? I inquired with The Source about PayPal a few weeks ago regarding whether the option was being considered. For me, personally (and I know this isn't a peer-reviewed research project), I prefer PayPal and it has been a significant part of the (if not the whole) reason I end up going to other origami suppliers before The Source. I generally seek PayPal capable vendors first, not just in this case, for reasons of both simplicity and security. c -- Chris Lott <[email protected]>
