Dave Mitchell wrote:
The reason is because the meaning of elegance in origami is different 
(though folders who don't appreciate this often misuse the word). In origami 
elegance is a quality of the way in which the result is arrived at, not of 
the finished design, and in this respect it is similar to the usage in 
mathematics.

 
 
Can't Chris Lott use "elegant" to describe a finished piece/model/etc. as 
well?  I can see how the term could easily apply to either the process or the 
finished product.  I've seen some models that are absolutely elegant in terms 
of visual appeal.  I don't know how they were made, but I can see that they are 
elegant as works of art or craftsmanship (not to open up another can of 
worms).  I have also folded some origami that had an elegant process or 
sequence of folds.  The finished product may or may not be what appears elegant 
to my eye.  It seems a bit arbitrary, from a lingusitic point of view, to say 
that the word "elegant" has to mean the process only.  Isn't there room for 
both in a visual art?
 
Dawn Tucker
 
 


________________________________
From: "origami-requ...@lists.digitalorigami.com" 
<origami-requ...@lists.digitalorigami.com>
To: origami@lists.digitalorigami.com 
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2012 12:00 PM
Subject: Origami Digest, Vol 79, Issue 10

Send Origami mailing list submissions to
    origami@lists.digitalorigami.com

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
    http://lists.digitalorigami.com/mailman/listinfo/origami
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
    origami-requ...@lists.digitalorigami.com

You can reach the person managing the list at
    origami-own...@lists.digitalorigami.com

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Origami digest..."


Today's Topics:

  1. Holiday folding events (area interest: Boston/Haverhill,    MA,
      USA) (Anne LaVin)
  2. Re: Linked memories (Meenakshi Mukerji)
  3. Origami Crocodile for Lacoste India (Himanshu Agrawal)
  4. Simple, but Elegant, Models (Dave Mitchell)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 14:13:08 -0500
From: Anne LaVin <anne.la...@gmail.com>
Subject: [Origami] Holiday folding events (area interest:
    Boston/Haverhill,    MA, USA)
To: The Origami Mailing List <origami@lists.digitalorigami.com>
Message-ID:
    <CAGKVWNWfT23ojKkvQFSsZK_NeSbWxT7bJYPwLSU2=ugdj2w...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi everyone!  Briefly donning my Origamido webmaster hat to announce:

Folding Holiday Ornaments & Boxes with Michael LaFosse and Richard
Alexander at the Creative Haverhill Shops @ 90 Washington St.,
Haverhill MA. (Next to the Tap Microbrewery) The workshops are on a
walk-in basis, come early for a seat. There will be a $5 materials
fee. (Parents may need to "team fold" with a child 8 or younger.)

We'll be offering this program on the following dates:

Saturday, Nov. 10, 1:30 to 3:30
Saturday, Nov. 17, 1:30 to 3:30
Saturday, Dec. 1, 1:30 to 3:30
Saturday, Dec. 8, 1:30 to 3:30
Saturday, Dec. 15, 1:30 to 3:30
Saturday, Dec. 22, 1:30 to 3:30

Please join Michael and Richard for some holiday folding fun!

Anne LaVin
on behalf of Origamido Studio


------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2012 11:17:55 -0800 (PST)
From: Meenakshi Mukerji <mmukhopadh...@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [Origami] Linked memories
To: origami@lists.digitalorigami.com
Message-ID:
    <1352488675.27397.yahoomailclas...@web141202.mail.bf1.yahoo.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


> Paul Jackson's Electra. It was my first 3D modular. This was before I 
> was on the net, and I lived in an isolated area, so I was on my own. I 
> estimated I had 22 hours into it, because I had such a time with the 
> assembly. I shellacked the hell out of it to make it last. I still have 
> it.
>
> Jane Millikan


You are probably talking about Electra by David Mitchell.  Among other 
publications it was also published in "The Ultimate Papercraft and Origami 
Book" by Paul Jackson.  It is a delightful model indeed and was probably my 
third modular after Ornamental Omega Star (Michael Naughton) and Penultimate 
Dodecahedron (Robert Neale).

Regards,
Meenakshi


__________________________________________________
Have you visited my modular origami website? http://www.origamee.net





------------------------------

Message: 3
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 10:04:36 +0530
From: Himanshu Agrawal <himorig...@gmail.com>
Subject: [Origami] Origami Crocodile for Lacoste India
To: The Origami Mailing List <origami@lists.digitalorigami.com>
Message-ID:
    <cakwsu3wsy+n1tbbdrt0ehz5u7tuu58yyugkeyjtnfzv-fgf...@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi,

I would like to share a picture of the 8-feet long Origami Crocodile I
folded for Lacoste India.

Here's the Flickr link:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/orukami/8165694660/in/photostream

Thank you.

Himanshu.


------------------------------

Message: 4
Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2012 14:38:13 -0000
From: "Dave Mitchell" <dave.mitch...@virgin.net>
Subject: [Origami] Simple, but Elegant, Models
To: <origami@lists.digitalorigami.com>
Message-ID: <34018644E32047E0B5434BC3AF6DFF10@Laptop>
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
    reply-type=original

I wrote:

>> This is, of course, the reason why you can't judge the elegance of a 
>> design
>> without folding it yourself.

Chris Lott replied:

> I don't see why this is true...we can judge the elegance of a chair or
> a car or whatever without making it. Why not a piece of origami art?

The reason is because the meaning of elegance in origami is different 
(though folders who don't appreciate this often misuse the word). In origami 
elegance is a quality of the way in which the result is arrived at, not of 
the finished design, and in this respect it is similar to the usage in 
mathematics.

Within this broader usage elegance can be a quality of the whole folding 
sequence, or of just one or more moves within it. I have also heard it used 
of modular designs, but again I feel it is descriptive of the way in which 
the modules go together rather than the finished form that they create.

Outside origami 'elegant' is often used to mean 'clean' ... as in 'a chair 
has clean lines'. It doesn't matter how the chair was made. You are 
describing a quality of the finished result.

Dave










End of Origami Digest, Vol 79, Issue 10
***************************************

Reply via email to