Jeremy
At 06:31 PM 2/27/2003 -0500, Jeff Squyres wrote:
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Jason B. wrote:
> Yes... but these issues are present now. If foo.rpm depends on > something that isn't there, it won't install... ever. If you depend on > a file that isn't there, it won't install... ever. This is a packaging > issue, not a dependency issue. > > We're worried about getting things installed that are legitimately (and > rightly) required but not in the list already. That's what > auto-dep-checking can help with.
EXCACTLY.
I think this is a nice, concise statement of what auto-dependency is trying to solve.
-- {+} Jeff Squyres {+} [EMAIL PROTECTED] {+} http://www.lam-mpi.org/
------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Oscar-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _______________________________________________ Oscar-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
