On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Jason B. wrote:
> Yes... but these issues are present now. If foo.rpm depends on
> something that isn't there, it won't install... ever. If you depend on
> a file that isn't there, it won't install... ever. This is a packaging
> issue, not a dependency issue.
>
> We're worried about getting things installed that are legitimately (and
> rightly) required but not in the list already. That's what
> auto-dep-checking can help with.
EXCACTLY.
I think this is a nice, concise statement of what auto-dependency is
trying to solve.
--
{+} Jeff Squyres
{+} [EMAIL PROTECTED]
{+} http://www.lam-mpi.org/
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
_______________________________________________
Oscar-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
