Okay, so I guess in the 'new' code we will check to see if it already has a valid working ntp server entry, if not, then use the default (pool.ntp.org). But the whole point of the ntpconfig package is so that you can change the ntp server to whatever you choose, with the GUI.
Cheers, Bernard > -----Original Message----- > From: David N. Lombard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 17:54 > To: Bernard Li > Cc: Lombard, David N; OSCAR-DEVEL > Subject: Re: [Oscar-devel] [ oscar-Bugs-1084690 ] (FC2) ntpd > pemission warning on client nodes > > The *clearly*, the default should be the current working ntp > server if such a thing is configured, shouldn't it... > > Only after we've determined the current value is bad should > we be so arrogant to change it. :P > > Bernard Li wrote: > > Hi David: > > > > Remember that the user actually get to choose the NTP servers by > > selecting 'configure selected packages' for the package > ntpconfig, so > > you have to bear that in mind too. 'pool.ntp.org' will be there by > > default, to replace the existing 3 servers. > > > > Cheers, > > > > Bernard > > > > > >>-----Original Message----- > >>From: Lombard, David N [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 15:59 > >>To: Bernard Li; OSCAR-DEVEL > >>Subject: RE: [Oscar-devel] [ oscar-Bugs-1084690 ] (FC2) > ntpd pemission > >>warning on client nodes > >> > >>OK then, it's time to fix this. We use a standard ntp > server if and > >>only if ntp isn't actually running. I'll play a little to find a > >>robust-enough test > >> > >>I also noticed post_server_install had some SuSE fixes lacking from > >>post_rpm_install. > >> > >>-- > >>David N. Lombard > >> > >>My comments represent my opinions, not those of Intel Corporation. > >> > >> > >>>-----Original Message----- > >>>From: Bernard Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 3:56 PM > >>>To: Lombard, David N; OSCAR-DEVEL > >>>Subject: RE: [Oscar-devel] [ oscar-Bugs-1084690 ] (FC2) ntpd > >> > >>pemission > >> > >>>warning on client nodes > >>> > >>>Hi Dave: > >>> > >>>I tend to agree with your points about modifying the config > >> > >>file, that > >> > >>>is traditionally the way I do it, but I was just wondering > >> > >>if there was > >> > >>>a specific reason why it was done this way (for ntpconfig). > >>> > >>>BTW, even if ntp is running, if you modify the conf file > and restart > >> > >>the > >> > >>>daemon, it should be okay, right? > >>> > >>>Cheers, > >>> > >>>Bernard > >>> > >>> > >>>>-----Original Message----- > >>>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of > >>>>Lombard, David N > >>>>Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 14:23 > >>>>To: OSCAR-DEVEL > >>>>Subject: RE: [Oscar-devel] [ oscar-Bugs-1084690 ] (FC2) ntpd > >>>>pemission warning on client nodes > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>Comment By: Bernard Li (bernardli) > >>>>> > >>>>>Date: 2005-01-04 11:37 > >>>>> > >>>>>Message: > >>>>>Logged In: YES > >>>>>user_id=879102 > >>>>> > >>>>>/etc/ntp.conf is generated by the ntpconfig package scripts > >>>>>post_server_install and post_rpm_install and that is what I > >>>> > >>>>am trying > >>>> > >>>>>to modify. Unfortunately it does not keep a backup of > >> > >>the original > >> > >>>>>conf file which came with the rpm... perhaps this could be > >>>> > >>>>changed... > >>>> > >>>>Let's discuss this here instead of SF. > >>>> > >>>>OK, now that I've looked at post_server_install, a couple > >> > >>of comments > >> > >>>>Why don't you pick up the existing file and modify that? > >>>>This will lead to the following Good Things(TM): > >>>> > >>>>a) If ntp is, in fact, running, you shouldn't be a-messin' > >>>>with the choice of the server. Here and other places, > the default > >>>>gateway is also the ntp server. > >>>> > >>>>b) You won't need to "remember" the correct driftfile, it will > >>>>already be set. > >>>> > >>>>c) You only need to change to lines that you actually need to. > >>>> > >>>>Ditto for post_rpm_install, but commenting out all save > the server > >>>>line, which you replace... > >>>> > >>>>-- > >>>>David N. Lombard > >>>> > >>>>My comments represent my opinions, not those of Intel Corporation. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday > >> > >>blues Get a > >> > >>>>FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. > >>>>It's fun and FREE -- well, > >> > >>almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt > >> > >>>>_______________________________________________ > >>>>Oscar-devel mailing list > >>>>[email protected] > >>>>https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel > >>>> > >> > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a > > FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. > > It's fun and FREE -- well, > almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt > > _______________________________________________ > > Oscar-devel mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel > > > > > > > -- > David N. Lombard > Rossmoor, Orange County, CA > http://www.fourmilab.ch/cgi-bin/uncgi/Earth?imgsize=320&opt=-z > &lat=33.8&ns=North&lon=118.08&ew=West&alt=7&img=learth.evif > ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Oscar-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel
