Hi Olivier,

fedora 17 or 18 looks a lot different from the ones (fc-12 or fc-13) that I 
used to use long time ago. I think I hit the issue of installing packman 
because of the conflict between filesystem and packman package and I wonder if 
this is related to the systemd package too?

Anyway, the downloads/ website is synched but I still could not build the 
jobmonarch rpm.

> Command to execute: yume --repo file:/tftpboot/oscar/rhel-6-x86_64 -y  
> install torque-oscar torque-oscar-devel
> --> Requirements installed
> --> Building binary packages
> --> Packaging jobmonarch
> --> Downloading sources for jobmonarch...
> --> Downloading  
> http://svn.oscar.openclustergroup.org/pkgs/downloads/jobmonarch-0.4-0.3.src.rpm
>  to /var/lib/oscar-packager/downloads
> File “jobmonarch-0.4-0.3.src.rpm” already there; not retrieving.
> 
> --> Setting $RPMBUILDOPTS= --target noarch...
> --> Executing: /usr/bin/build_rpms --only-rpm 
> /var/lib/oscar-packager/downloads/jobmonarch-0.4-0.3.src.rpm  --target noarch
> Building only RPMs, passed arguments are interpreted as SRPMs
> Executing: mv *jobmonarch*.rpm /tftpboot/oscar/rhel-6-x86_64
> --> Binary packages created
> --> Building binary packages
> --> Packaging pbs_python
> error: failed to stat /tmp/oscar-packager/jobmonarch/rpm/pbs_python.spec: No 
> such file or directory
> ERROR: Impossible to execute rpmbuild -bb 
> /tmp/oscar-packager/jobmonarch/rpm/pbs_python.spec at /usr/bin/build_package 
> line 256
> ERROR: Impossible to create the binary (pbs_python, 0, 
> /tftpboot/oscar/rhel-6-x86_64) at /usr/bin/build_package line 256
> ERROR: Impossible to build a binary (/tmp/oscar-packager/jobmonarch) at 
> /usr/bin/build_package line 256
> ERROR: Impossible to build some binaries at /usr/bin/build_package line 256
> ERROR: Impossible to prepare the prereqs (/tmp/oscar-packager/jobmonarch, 
> /tftpboot/oscar/rhel-6-x86_64) at /usr/bin/build_package line 256
> ERROR: Impossible to manage prereqs for the creation of the binary package at 
> /usr/bin/build_package line 257.
> --> ERROR: Impossible to create some binary packages
> make: *** [rpm] Error 2
> 
> =============================================================================
> == Preparing pool: /tftpboot/oscar/rhel-6-x86_64
> =============================================================================
> 
> CHECKSUM: /tmp/pool_oscar_rhel-6-x86_64.md5 
> new:93b10dad33fbde07f104888cc395354a old:a6a79787819f6705e5b0652c5260a457
> Pool type: rpm
> Repository /tftpboot/oscar/rhel-6-x86_64 is now ready.
> [root@peach rhel-6-x86_64]# 
> =============================================================================
> == [INFO] Generated binary packages are in /tftpboot/oscar/rhel-6-x86_64
> =============================================================================
> 
> Errors occured during the OSCAR packaging.
> OSCAR components that failed are:  at /usr/bin/oscar-packager line 399
>         main::do_packaging('/etc/oscar/oscar-packager/included_unstable.cfg', 
> '/etc/oscar/oscar-packager/included_opkgs_unstable.cfg') called at 
> /usr/bin/oscar-packager line 471
>         main::package_included('jobmonarch', 'ARRAY(0x14cfb10)', 
> '/etc/oscar/oscar-packager') called at /usr/bin/oscar-packager line 526
> [ jobmonarch ]
> Array: 1 element(s)
> 
> [root@peach rhel-6-x86_64]#

 
Regards,

--
- DongInn

On Mar 12, 2013, at 6:29 AM, LAHAYE Olivier <olivier.lah...@cea.fr> wrote:

> 
> Hi,
> 
> This is really a great pleasure to see people interrested in OSCAR again :-)
> 
> DongInn, I've worked on fedora-17-x86_64 port last WE and it is near to be 
> functional. Thanks to this, I4ve found and fixed a few set of oscar bugs. 
> I've even managed to build a recent systemimager (not yet tested 
> unfortunately). I gave a look at oscar-configurator and I've identified 2 or 
> 3 things that needs to be fixed (centos6 as well): grub2, systemd and 
> NetworkManager).
> 
> It is available here: 
> http://olivier.lahaye1.free.fr/OSCAR/repos/unstable/fc-17-x86_64/
> So far, I've been able to reach the build image step (but this needs 
> tunning). Once passed, I should be able to test the systemimager inird and 
> kernel when deploying a node.
> 
> I'm now working on systemimager build under centos-6 (priority). It builds, 
> but packaging fails because of makefile race conditions and bad include 
> orders when using CFLAGS variable, but I think I'm near a build success and 
> hopefully a working systemimager).
> 
> Best regards.
> -- 
>    Olivier LAHAYE
>    CEA DRT/LIST/DCSI/DIR

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_d2d_mar
_______________________________________________
Oscar-devel mailing list
Oscar-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-devel

Reply via email to