Rich:
If you mean the RH7.2 stuff, I did NOT do any of it, bcse I wan't sure the
mdk8.2 rpm would also be problematic.
Marsha
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Richard
Ferri
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 8:33 AM
To: Jeff Squyres; Marsha Meredith
Cc: Oscar-users
Subject: RE: [Oscar-users] rpm-4.0.4-13mdk.rpm
Jeff,
On the advice of counsel, I advised Teresa's group
to drop ganglia out of the mix for debugging purposes.
The way I asked them to do it was by eliminating the
oscar/packages/ganglia directory after downloading
oscar.
Marsha, when you used the rpm-4.0.3 version, did you
have to use the workaround listed in the oscar docs
(something
about forcing systemimager to install files by setting
a flag in a file somewhere)? In the docs it says
something
about if you use the workaround (for rpm-4.0.3)
systemimager may in fact fail, but you won't get any
indication of the failure -- is it possible that
Marsha's problems with pvm and mpi are because some
files failed to install, and systemimager didn't
report it (because of the workaround employed?) Rich
--- Jeff Squyres <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 30 Jul 2002, Marsha Meredith wrote:
>
> > After chasing down a few dependencies, we got all
> the way through
> > the Oscar install EXCEPT for the MPICH, LAM AND
> PVM tests. I'm getting
> > a "missing module" error with no mpicc or mpirun
> found. Is that an easy
>
> A few questions:
>
> 1. Is this with RH 7.2, or MDK 8.2? (I seem to
> recall that you guys
> switched back to RH 7.2, but want to be sure)
> I'm also assuming that
> this is OSCAR 1.3, correct?
>
> 2. Run a PBS job manually with the "qsub -I" command
> (you should get a
> shell prompt on one of your nodes). At the shell
> prompt, run "echo
> $PATH". What path do you get? (you may need to
> run this step as a
> normal user, not root)
>
> 3. On the head node and on the shell from "qsub -I",
> do:
>
> rpm -q modules env-switcher lam-module
>
> What output do you get in both of these
> situations?
>
> > fix? would the new rpm rpm address it? Oh, yeah.
> We did not include
> > ganglia in the install, but I don't think it would
> really have caused
> > any new problems.
>
> 4. How did you not include ganglia in the install?
>
> Hypethetically, not including ganglia in the install
> should not cause
> these problems, but it may depend on what you did to
> exclude ganglia from
> the install.
>
> {+} Jeff Squyres
> {+} [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> {+} http://www.lam-mpi.org/
>
>
>
>
-------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The
> leading online job board
> for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for
> tech jobs today!
> http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31
> _______________________________________________
> Oscar-users mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-users
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Health - Feel better, live better
http://health.yahoo.com
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board
for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today!
http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31
_______________________________________________
Oscar-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-users
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board
for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today!
http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31
_______________________________________________
Oscar-users mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-users
