Mark,

I took a quick glimpse at the diff, and here's what I found out:

<  - /tftpboot/rpm/pvm-modules-oscar-3.4.4+11-3.i386.rpm
<  - /tftpboot/rpm/pvm-3.4.4+11-3.i386.rpm
---
>  - /tftpboot/rpm/pvm-3.4.4-19.i386.rpm
>  - /tftpboot/rpm/pvm-gui-3.4.4-19.i386.rpm

< is my oscarinstall.log
> is Mark's oscarinstall.log

OSCAR 4.0 comes with pvm-3.4.4+11-3, Fedora Core 2 comes with 3.4.4-19.
I believe part of the PVM package setup script is to wipe /tftpboot/rpm
of any pvm* RPMs, so I am not sure why you still have the FC2 files in
/tftpboot/rpm, this may not be the cause of the problem, but is
definitely an issue - you should look into this.

Can you do cat /etc/redhat-release and also do rpm -qa | grep release on
the headnode?

Thanks,

Bernard

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of 
> Bernard Li
> Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 18:34
> To: Lombard, David N; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [Oscar-users] FC2, Step 4 install Failure.
> 
> I d/led the OSCAR 4.0 tarball and did an install.
> 
> I did get the Fedora patching error - BTW, I have filed this 
> bug already, see:
> 
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=10484
> 71&group_i
> d=9368&atid=109368
> 
> However, I didn't have the issue that Mark has.  When I build 
> the image, I just left everything default and selected 'dhcp' 
> for IP Assignment Method and 'reboot' for Post Install Action 
> - and it worked.
> 
> Mark, what Package File are you using?  Is it 
> /opt/oscar/oscarsamples/fedora-2-i386.rpmlist?
> 
> Here's the exact operations I performed to get to this point:
> 
> 1) Download OSCAR 4.0 tarball
> 2) Extract it
> 3) ./configure && make install
> 4) ./install_cluster eth1
> 5) Put in password
> 6) Select OSCAR Packages to Install (uncheck pfilter)
> 7) Install OSCAR Server Packages
> 8) Build OSCAR Client Image (see above for stuff I did)
> 
> I will try to do a diff with your oscarinstall.log and the 
> one I have, to see if there are any major differences.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Bernard
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Lombard, David N [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 13:51
> > To: Bernard Li; [email protected]
> > Subject: RE: [Oscar-users] FC2, Step 4 install Failure.
> > 
> > Bernard,
> > 
> > This appears to be Benoit's Fedora patch.
> > 
> > Looking at the patch
> > (packages/sis/fedora.patch/Image.pm.patch), hunk3 is 
> significant, and 
> > cause the distro not to be recognized, which is a likely 
> explanation 
> > of why Step4 didn't get a valid rpmlist.
> > 
> > I don't know why the hunk would fail in the first place; if it was 
> > already applied, then the failure shouldn't have caused any 
> problems, 
> > so that explanation is unlikely.
> > 
> > --
> > David N. Lombard
> > 
> > My comments represent my opinions, not those of Intel Corporation.
> > 
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Bernard Li [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 2:55 PM
> > >To: Mark Hamrick; Lombard, David N; 
> [email protected]
> > >Subject: RE: [Oscar-users] FC2, Step 4 install Failure.
> > >
> > >Hey Mark:
> > >
> > >The problem with Image.pm is not an issue, if you take a 
> look at the 
> > >.rej file, you'll noticed that the error is non-code related
> > (just some
> > >string/comments).
> > >
> > >Did you download or install any special packages off OPD?
> > >
> > >Honestly I'm stumped - Dave any ideas?
> > >
> > >Thanks,
> > >
> > >Bernard
> > >
> > >> -----Original Message-----
> > >> From: Mark Hamrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 14:47
> > >> To: Bernard Li
> > >> Subject: Re: [Oscar-users] FC2, Step 4 install Failure.
> > >>
> > >> Bernard,
> > >>
> > >> Thanks for looking at this, and sorry for the delay.
> > >>
> > >> I reran the install with FC2 as a workstation install.  
> I followed 
> > >> the install procedures.  I have attached the 
> Image.pm.rej file and 
> > >> the Oscar logs.  I compressed the install log so it would
> > not be so
> > >> large.  I fixed the network issue you mentioned, I had
> > accidently not
> > >> set the internal
> > >> eth1 interface to come up at boot in the previous install.
> > >>
> > >> I am still getting a weird failure near the start:
> > >> patching file usr/lib/systeminstaller/SystemInstaller/Image.pm
> > >> Hunk #1 succeeded at 1 with fuzz 1.
> > >> Hunk #2 FAILED at 19.
> > >> Hunk #3 FAILED at 31.
> > >> 2 out of 4 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file 
> > >> usr/lib/systeminstaller/SystemInstaller/Image.pm.rej
> > >> SIS patch for fedora done
> > >> --> Successfully ran server core package
> > post_server_install scripts
> > >> --> Successfully ran OSCAR wizard_prep script Successfully ran 
> > >> --> wizard_prep
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Then, in step 4, the same issue as before:
> > >> --> Returning oscar_clients packages for base:
> > >> Couldn't find file for SISstage. at 
> > >> /usr/lib/systeminstaller/SystemInstaller/PackageBest.pm line 110 
> > >> Couldn't find best files. at 
> > >> /usr/lib/systeminstaller/SystemInstaller/Package.pm line
> > 181 Failed
> > >> to find files for all packages. at /usr/bin/mksiimage line 164
> > >> 1: 2005-1-23 16:43:47 [SystemInstaller::Package :: Line
> > 77] Expected
> > >> lines of output: 64.6
> > >> 2: 2005-1-23 16:43:47 [SystemInstaller::Package :: Line
> > 79] Finding
> > >> package install files.
> > >> 3: 2005-1-23 16:43:47 [SystemInstaller::Package :: Line
> > 180] Finding
> > >> files with module SystemInstaller::Package::Rpm
> > >> 4: 2005-1-23 16:43:47 [SystemInstaller::Package::Rpm :: Line 75] 
> > >> Finding best Rpms, this may take a minute.
> > >> 5: 2005-1-23 16:43:47 [main :: Line 165] Unmounting /proc.
> > >> 6: 2005-1-23 16:43:48 [SystemInstaller::Image :: Line 
> 67] rmimage 
> > >> oscarimage
> > >> FATAL: Can't remove
> > /var/lib/systemimager/scripts/oscarimage.master!
> > >>
> > >> So, I am thinking these two are related, but I am not 
> sure how to 
> > >> debug it.  It appears that my problem is with
> > SystemInstaller.  I did
> > >> check, the directory /var/lib/systemimager/scripts/ does exist.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Mark
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Bernard Li wrote:
> > >>
> > >> >>-----Original Message-----
> > >> >>From: Mark Hamrick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >> >>Sent: Friday, February 18, 2005 17:06
> > >> >>To: Bernard Li
> > >> >>Subject: RE: [Oscar-users] FC2, Step 4 install Failure.
> > >> >>
> > >> >>Bernard,
> > >> >>
> > >> >>Thanks for replying.  Steps 1 through five where done
> > >> verbatim.  The
> > >> >>start_over script was not run.  I will look into the
> > >> network settings,
> > >> >>I do not believe that anything special was done.
> > >> >>
> > >> >>Since I am at a Univeristy with a site license for Redhat,
> > >> I am going
> > >> >>to try RHEL 3.0 AS next, so hopefully that will work.  
> > Once that is
> > >> >>working, I will try to come back and get
> > >> >>FC2 with Oscar working to diagnose this issue.
> > >> >>
> > >> >>Thanks,
> > >> >>Mark Hamrick
> > >> >>
> > >> >>On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 15:21 -0800, Bernard Li wrote:
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>>Hey Mark:
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>I'll list the general steps to install OSCAR on FC2, so you
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>can tell
> > >> >>
> > >> >>
> > >> >>>me if you did anything out of the ordinary:
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>1) Install FC2 - choose workstation install
> > >> >>>2) Copy all RPMs from all *4* CDs to /tftpboot/rpm
> > >> >>>3) Download tarball
> > >> >>>4) Extract, ./configure && make install
> > >> >>>5) Run ./install_cluster ethX and follow steps from GUI
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>Can you list any extra OPD packages you might have 
> downloaded & 
> > >> >>>selected for installation?
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>You might also want to attach the Image.pm.rej file.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>The bug I filed only happens if you run the 
> start_over script - 
> > >> >>>basically it happens if you try to re-patch an already
> > >> patched file.
> > >> >>>
> > >> >>>Also, do you have some special network settings, this
> > >> >>>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Mark Hamrick
> > >> System Administrator
> > >> Department of Mathematics
> > >> UNC-Charlotte
> > >>
> > >>
> > 
> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------
> SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & 
> candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
> Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
> http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=ick
> _______________________________________________
> Oscar-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-users
> 


-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Oscar-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/oscar-users

Reply via email to