Hi, I really am waiting to have some time to start playing with haXe. For me right now it's just a matter of time. Then, if everything works fine I will show it to my boss, and that will be the critical step.
I can't ask for a specific feature because I haven't made tests yet, but I'm very happy seeing Nicolas hearing other developers in the haXe mailing list. I'm pretty sure you will hear us! What happend with the for sintax, by the way? I stop reading the post after 50 replies xDDDD Cheers, Zarate On 5/16/06, erix tekila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Yes, there is a lot of possibilities in haXe, but that doesn't mean that > > you have to learn/master them all to use the language :) I can > > understand that some talks on the haXe list can be a bit technical when > > it comes to language design choices, but you feel overhelmed by > > enum/signatures or other things, just ignore them and use only classes. > > > Sure. It's ok for me. > Type inference is a great addition. > I discover that when I tried to port some project to mtasc -strict. > No need to retype every local vars and to put Void at the end of functions > !! > > So be creative, we'll discover the gems… > > > > _______________________________________________ > osflash mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > > > -- Zárate _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
