On 8/30/06, Scott Hyndman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wouldn't it make a lot more sense to look into how Eclipse handles > this? We don't need to define an interface, we just need to build to > one. > > I've been starting to build some little Eclipse plugins, and let me > tell you, it handles a ton of stuff so you don't have to. >
Well this is the kind of knowledge I am talking about! Cuz I have *no* idea. I havent looked into eclipse at all. If defining the API/ interface means nothing more than *identifying* it, that would be great. The idea is just to avoid the project becoming "build an IDE" and becoming "build a as2/as3/haXe parser. I think defining the scope and parameters of the project is the critical catalyst here. Hank _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
