Well, people here are geek, and we have geek talks. And we prefer being geek and talking geek. Personally i would prefer to have two different systems: and "introductory" site, *presenting* what's osflash and how to use it, and the current system for developers. It's not discrimination: when i was starting with osflash, i had a lot of doubts (concerning the language itself, despite knowing quite a lot about actionscript already) that i didn't formulated on the mailing list, because they weren't "geeky" enough. And some of the ones i've asked were never answered. And today, i prefer reading and talking about "how to apply this design pattern" or "what do you think about this framework" than "how can i load a MovieClip?".
In resume, I would prefer one "Welcome to Osflash, learn about osflash" web-site and another "now that you know the basics of osflash, let's start doing big things like we, geeky developers, do" website. It's a matter of opinion, and this is mine... João Saleiro PS: Geek in a good meaning, of course :P Ian Thomas wrote: >>> Or improving the current wiki. >>> > > I think this sounds much more viable than creating a whole newbie site > from scratch. If the information isn't there - then add it to the > Wiki. That's why it's a Wiki, after all! > > Ian > > _______________________________________________ > osflash mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org > > _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
