Hey Evert,

Where is your reply?


On Thursday 19 October 2006 6:54 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> You know I make most of my donating in secret due to religious beliefs. It
> sucks to be questioned on my donating based on my asking why Adobe did not
> contribute the time and financial efforts towards OSFlash. I think it is a
> valid question. Why not OSFlash why RIAForge. For once it would be nice if
> the corporate juggernauts would see guys like Aral. Why this Ray guy from
> RIAForge.
>
> Why is asking questions bad? Who taught the people not to ask why?
>
> On Thursday 19 October 2006 6:45 pm, Martin Heidegger wrote:
> > Sorry: Thats what I meant with fighting: Both arguments are
> > ridiculus.
> >
> > Where is the connection between if he is supporting to if
> > someone who is rich contributing?
> >
> > also
> >
> > Where do you see the that Adobe only wants to crush?
> >
> > Of course: They don't want to put money to something they
> > can get for free: Nobody else in a corporation would do that
> > (in my personal opinion this is A-grade unsocial but its the nature
> > of corporate business). Just some weird idealists would do that
> > might find this to be more appropriate.
> >
> > It is better than nothing that they try to make one of their guy getting
> > some things done for the open source community. Its part of the
> > public relations budget(or marketing?), can be calculated and brings
> > a technical argument for a product (all products in certain case) and
> > (almost forgot) adds internal knowhow. Everything reasonable from a
> > decent point of view.
> >
> > What really annoys me about this page that there has been put
> > effort into a public service without bringing together the people. This
> > would have increased the value of the RIAForge, of osflash (ManPower is
> > also a contribution) of Flash as platform (are there similar platforms
> > for flex/cf/dw/etc.?) in general. Furthermore with a dialog you could
> > have made RIAForge more anticipated better for use and maybe cheaper due
> > to the fact that they could have got help from outside. And I think this
> > is what most people feel.
> >
> > Anway: What do you aim?
> >
> > yours
> > Martin.
> >
> > 2006/10/20, Evert | Rooftop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > Besides,
> > >
> > > What are you contributing in the open source space, chris?
> > >
> > > Just been checking out your website: http://trackingsolutions.ca
> > > Have you made your donation to osflash or one of the projects you might
> > > be using yet?
> > >
> > > Evert
> > >
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > > Till,
> > > >
> > > > "BIG COOPERATE GARBAGE MACHINE" is not necessarily pointed at Adobe.
> > >
> > > Take it
> > >
> > > > as a generic term for ..., ..., ..., ..., fill in the blank.
> > > >
> > > > I never stated they were trying to take over the open source
> > > > landscape.
> > >
> > > You
> > >
> > > > did.
> > > >
> > > > Ben Forta Adobe what? did you put the words Adobe in there? I don't
> > > > see
> > >
> > > that
> > >
> > > > on the website.
> > > >
> > > > Tin hat? Hey everyone look at the crazy who asks questions!
> > > >
> > > > Hey the USS Liberty must have been attacked by Egypt how dare I think
> > > > it
> > >
> > > was
> > >
> > > > Israel.
> > > >
> > > > Sorry for questioning what looks fishy. I should have taken my place
> > > > in
> > >
> > > line.
> > >
> > > > I will only speak when spoken to. Point taken Till. I see there are
> > >
> > > several
> > >
> > > > people out there that want to jump on me for questioning motives.
> > > >
> > > > Nothing strange here folks just keep on moving along.
> > > >
> > > > Hey I have an idea. Adobe support an already thriving community with
> > >
> > > support.
> > >
> > > > Take a bit of a helpers roll. (I am not talking about a couple of
> > > > guys posting projects from Adobe and answering a few questions). What
> > > > about throwing some funding towards OSFlash.org to see things grow
> > > > there. Why RIAForge. OSFlash is already doing a great job. I am sure
> > > > that there is
> > >
> > > going
> > >
> > > > to be some that say this is just for the best. Well than OK.
> > > >
> > > > I now see why Richard Stallman gets so upset.
> > > >
> > > > On Thursday 19 October 2006 5:10 pm, Till Schneidereit wrote:
> > > >> Chris,
> > > >>
> > > >> I think you should either just let it go, or post some proof for
> > > >> your allegations. Or at least point out what lets you believe in
> > > >> some sort
> > >
> > > of
> > >
> > > >> conspiracy. And you'd have to do better than pointing out that the
> > >
> > > domain
> > >
> > > >> is owned by Adobe, because there wasn't ever any doubt about Adobe
> > >
> > > being
> > >
> > > >> involved in setting up RIAForge - hell, they even state right there
> > > >> on
> > >
> > > the
> > >
> > > >> "About" page that it was devised by (Adobe's) Ben Forta.[1]
> > > >> Concluding,
> > >
> > > I
> > >
> > > >> want to emphasize that I don't want to say that it's impossible that
> > > >> there's a "BIG COOPERATE GARBAGE MACHINE" devising devilish plans to
> > >
> > > take
> > >
> > > >> over the Flash open source landscape. I'm just saying that there
> > > >> really aren't any substantive signs for that being the case. Anyway,
> > > >> maybe you should keep your tinfoil hat on to prevent our new
> > > >> overlords from controlling you ;)
> > > >>
> > > >> cheers,
> > > >> till
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> [1]: http://www.riaforge.org/index.cfm?event=page.about
> > > >>
> > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > >>> I have nothing against Adobe I actually think they have some really
> > >
> > > cool
> > >
> > > >>> software and they have started some great stuff. Just a little
> > > >>> strange that Ray would have to use their Domain created just
> > > >>> recently. It is
> > >
> > > not
> > >
> > > >>> like Ray was in the corner and Adobe had to bail him out with the
> > > >>> only domain available.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> If Adobe wants to start an Open Source thing up then say so. Don't
> > >
> > > hide
> > >
> > > >>> in the bushes and let Ray take any falls that are coming.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I am sick of big corporate crap. I absolutely hate it. This just
> > >
> > > stinks
> > >
> > > >>> of some corporate board room meeting whose topic was "Dealing with
> > > >>> the Open Source Threat".
> > > >>>
> > > >>> People can say anything they want about it but I just can't stand
> > > >>> the garbage games.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> If people want to say lets just find ways to work together with
> > > >>> them. Well it is not a matter of working together with them. They
> > > >>> need to
> > >
> > > work
> > >
> > > >>> together with us. What is more agreeable than an Open Source
> > > >>> Project.
> > >
> > > No
> > >
> > > >>> one is ever saying we won't work with you. It is the "BIG COOPERATE
> > > >>> GARBAGE MACHINE" that wants to be fed.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> I run a business that has developed both closed and open source
> > >
> > > software.
> > >
> > > >>> I know what it is like while debating to launch your software, what
> > > >>> is the best license to use. Just stop it with the Microsoft/SCO
> > > >>> secret
> > >
> > > agent
> > >
> > > >>> games. I suppose it will never stop as long as money is involved.
> > > >>>
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Last thing... Good job to all you Open Source programmers. Without
> > > >>> you
> > >
> > > we
> > >
> > > >>> would be in a really bad computing state. I love Linux and Open
> > > >>> Source and am very greatfull for the way it has opened my eyes to
> > > >>> corporate evil.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> HEY THERE IS MORE TO LIFE THAN MONEY!
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Chris Cherrett
> > > >>>
> > > >>> On Thursday 19 October 2006 5:35 am, Peter Elst wrote:
> > > >>>> Its on the about page of RIAForge.com:
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> <quote> RIAForge was the brainchild of Ben Forta. The principal
> > > >>>> developer for the project is Raymond Camden
> > > >>>> <http://ray.camdenfamily.com></quote>
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Domain name ownership has been brought up before, so what we owns
> > > >>>> the domain or runs the thing -- Adobe takes an open source
> > > >>>> initiative and all of a sudden its some conspiracy or an attempt
> > > >>>> to assassinate a community?
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> Let's just find ways to work together.
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> - Peter
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > > >>>>> by the way ray is suppose to be the guy who started riaforge.
> > > >>>>>
> > > >>>>> On Thursday 19 October 2006 5:24 am,
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > > >>>>>> Hey check out:
> > > >>>>>> http://ray.camdenfamily.com/
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> then:
> > > >>>>>> http://www.riaforge.org
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> One looks like a quick install of a template and the other looks
> > >
> > > like
> > >
> > > >>>>>> a design team worked on it.
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> Too funny!
> > > >>>>>>
> > > >>>>>> On Thursday 19 October 2006 5:19 am,
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> > > >>>>>>> Whois is great!
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> And the verdict is Adobe!
> > > >>>>>>>
> > > >>>>>>> I was not really following the thread but if someone already
> > > >>>>>>> found this then sorry.......
> > > >>>>
> > > >>>> _______________________________________________
> > > >>>> osflash mailing list
> > > >>>> [email protected]
> > > >>>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> > > >>>
> > > >>> _______________________________________________
> > > >>> osflash mailing list
> > > >>> [email protected]
> > > >>> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > osflash mailing list
> > > > [email protected]
> > > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > osflash mailing list
> > > [email protected]
> > > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> osflash mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org

_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org

Reply via email to