I gotta agree with Hank on this one. I don't see why anyone would think this thread has included any flaming, although it could have certainly gone that way.
-austin On Wed Jan 03 12:06 , hank williams wrote: > On 1/3/07, Rákos Attila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >Well, I think this thread has turned into a simple flame. > > > I dont think so. I think people (on all sides) are saying intelligent things > and speaking politely. I dont consider discussing issues, even in > disagreement, to be a flame and I do wish people would stop saying that all > disagreements are flames. > > Did somebody mention any > >features that are essential and indispensable for every programmer > >without exception and provided by a single and one editor only? > > > Nope, but that is not what the discussion was about. If you read from the > beginning, the discussion was about comments in a particular book called the > pragmatic programmer which suggests everyone switch to emacs. > > I > >think did not. Customization? Syntax-highlighting? Code-completion? > >Refactoring? Multilingual support? CVS support? Automatized compiling > >and building? These are features provided by several editors, GUI ones > >and command-line ones too. So what we are talking about? > > > > If you read carefully, I have several times stated that there are features > that *I* need in eclipse JDT that no one has stated are in emacs. These are > features that I depend on. Others have said that they dont need such > features, which is fine. But it is inaccurate to suggest that all the > editors have all the same features. > > Regards, > Hank > _______________________________________________ > osflash mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org -- Austin Haas Pet Tomato, Inc. http://pettomato.com _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
