>> So what you're saying is :
>>  - AS3 is not 100% compatible with ES4
>>  - ES4 is not yet finished
>>  - there will be an AS4 in the future, with incompatible changes wrt AS3
>>
> 
> you're missing my point on purpose
> 
> some incompatibilities that if you followed some link I provided
> have workaround, they are not blocker

Same as MTASC. There are a few incompatibilites, most of them in order 
to improve code quality. If you find others, you might fill some bug and 
it will be fixed.

> my point was about the choice of Adobe to not implement a private class
> because this could be a real blocker in the long run

FYI, haXe has privates classes, and they work like a charm for Flash9 as 
well.

>> Also, all the programming languages are developed by people that made
>> choices about what to add or not to the language, with a rationale
>> behind each choice. I don't see how a specification change something
>> about this.
>>
> 
> let's say that I don't like your choices

Ok, that's fine with me this way. Next time instead of saying that you 
don't like the language because it doesn't have a specification, please 
explain which aspect of the haXe features you don't like and how you 
would suggest improving it.

Nicolas

_______________________________________________
osflash mailing list
[email protected]
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org

Reply via email to