On 9/12/07, Nicolas Cannasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > Ok, that's fine with me this way. Next time instead of saying that you > don't like the language because it doesn't have a specification, please > explain which aspect of the haXe features you don't like and how you > would suggest improving it. >
we can talk about this over and over, fine I got nothing against haXe by itself, I just don't care about it because compared to ES4, whatever features you add, whatever improvement you make sorry but I do think it just can not compete with ES4 I don't say that ES4 (or even AS3) is perfect, but this spec got a huge potential that can be resumed in one phrase: the power of numbers Java or C# are strong language because they have numbers of developpers in few years in the futur I perfectly see ES4 and its different implementation having the same power of numbers AS3 coders can use a part of it right now, and it will get even better at AS4 times I think other communities more based on the browser will gladly welcome something as JS2 and with times we will find ourselves with the same spec implemented in different environments, running on almost the same VM (Tamarin) and those different communities (AS dev, Ajax dev, etc.) will be able to unite behind that spec and share their codes and findings that's why I think a spec, this ES4 spec is so important but nothing new here Nicolas as we already had this conversation, you think you can reach ubiquity trough the compiler (1 language for 1 compiler to many environments/hosts) I think on the over end that ubiquity can be reach by the specification of the language (1 language spec to many compilers and environments) zwetan _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
