Zwetan,
AUGHHH!!!.... : ) dude... ES4 Does NOT exist... it's just a pipe dream... it's a proposal... it is not real until we can use it! Until then it's as useless as fried chicken on a Vegan's plate. What we are talking about and what Nicolas has done is real... it exists and can be used. I'm not going to use a particular technology based on what I think might happen in a proposal to a specification that is not yet implemented!! We want real things now... not proposal bits that may or may not make it into AS4 ( Assuming there is going to be an AS4 ). Cheers, Sam On Sep 12, 2007, at 5:39 PM, zwetan wrote: > On 9/12/07, Nicolas Cannasse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [...] >> Ok, that's fine with me this way. Next time instead of saying that >> you >> don't like the language because it doesn't have a specification, >> please >> explain which aspect of the haXe features you don't like and how you >> would suggest improving it. >> > > we can talk about this over and over, fine > > I got nothing against haXe by itself, I just don't care about it > > because compared to ES4, whatever features you add, > whatever improvement you make > sorry but I do think it just can not compete with ES4 > > I don't say that ES4 (or even AS3) is perfect, > but this spec got a huge potential that can be resumed in one phrase: > the power of numbers > > Java or C# are strong language because they have numbers of > developpers > > in few years in the futur I perfectly see ES4 and its different > implementation > having the same power of numbers > > AS3 coders can use a part of it right now, and it will get even better > at AS4 times > I think other communities more based on the browser will gladly > welcome something as JS2 > > and with times we will find ourselves with the same spec > implemented in > different environments, running on almost the same VM (Tamarin) and > those different communities (AS dev, Ajax dev, etc.) will be able > to unite behind that spec and share their codes and findings > > that's why I think a spec, this ES4 spec is so important > > but nothing new here Nicolas as we already had this conversation, > you think you can reach ubiquity trough the compiler > (1 language for 1 compiler to many environments/hosts) > I think on the over end that ubiquity can be reach by the > specification of the language > (1 language spec to many compilers and environments) > > zwetan > > _______________________________________________ > osflash mailing list > [email protected] > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org _______________________________________________ osflash mailing list [email protected] http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/osflash_osflash.org
