Hi Roland, On 9/29/07, Smeenk, R.J.M. (Roland) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In my opinion all we need to do is support the old functionality through > the old interfaces. This doesn't mean that we cannot use the new > datastructure for supporting the old way of working. In two complete > code paths would you also want to store the data in two separate > locations?
To support the old method you have to support both get and set as they were before. > For easing porting of old applications we could also add an osgUtil > class that can compile a new 6 face image from 6 single images and vice > versa. > This helper class could also be used in TextureCubeMap and the .osg and > .ive readerwriter, but I don't know if this introduces new dependencies. I am trying to get 2.2 out the door. This means not rocking the boat introducing extra steps that users have to jump through. If it weren't so close to 2.2 I would be more relaxed about this stuff. Right now the changes you've made feel way too intrusive to risk it. Robert. _______________________________________________ osg-submissions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-submissions-openscenegraph.org
