Hi Don et. al., On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Robert Osfield <[email protected]> wrote: > osgQt could potentially be built so that QWebViewImage is optional > depending on the availability of QWebKit, or perhaps a more convenient > approach would be to move the implementation of the QWebViewImage > entirely into the include/osgQt/QWebViewImage header. Implementating > everything in the header would mean that osgQt library itself wouldn't > ever need to build against QWebkit, only applications like > osgQtBrowser would require QWebKit. I'll have a tinker to see how > straight forward this is.
I've now experimented with moving the QWebViewImage implementation entirely into the header, removing it from the build of osgQt, but in theory the header should still be installed as part of include/osgQt. When applications require QWebViewImage they'll just include it as usual and things should just work as before. This change means that only applications that require QWebViewImage will need QWebKit installed, so for the OSG that means just osgQtBrowser. I've got things compiling under Linux and hopefully it'll work just fine on other platforms as well. Changes are now checked into svn/trunk. Cheers, Robert. _______________________________________________ osg-submissions mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-submissions-openscenegraph.org
