Hi Robert, J-S,
I've been working with OSG for about 6 years now, always from a stable
release. You've now succeeded in pulling me over to the dark side and the
latest svn/trunk to look at the osgQt library. I'll grab J-S's work as
soon as he thinks it's a wrap.
-Don Leich
Robert Osfield wrote:
Hi Don et. al.,
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 8:57 AM, Robert Osfield
<[email protected]> wrote:
osgQt could potentially be built so that QWebViewImage is optional
depending on the availability of QWebKit, or perhaps a more convenient
approach would be to move the implementation of the QWebViewImage
entirely into the include/osgQt/QWebViewImage header. Implementating
everything in the header would mean that osgQt library itself wouldn't
ever need to build against QWebkit, only applications like
osgQtBrowser would require QWebKit. I'll have a tinker to see how
straight forward this is.
I've now experimented with moving the QWebViewImage implementation
entirely into the header, removing it from the build of osgQt, but in
theory the header should still be installed as part of include/osgQt.
When applications require QWebViewImage they'll just include it as
usual and things should just work as before.
This change means that only applications that require QWebViewImage
will need QWebKit installed, so for the OSG that means just
osgQtBrowser.
I've got things compiling under Linux and hopefully it'll work just
fine on other platforms as well. Changes are now checked into
svn/trunk.
Cheers,
Robert.
_______________________________________________
osg-submissions mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-submissions-openscenegraph.org
