I vote for 2)
I think we should provide examples on how to build an external
application that is OSG-based, the tutorials are probably good candidates.
They could also be used with different OSG versions.
I can help to set up the CMake projects.
P.S.
It seems to me to not have received the original Robert message, It is
not the first ime I got a reply to a message I' ve never received.
has it occured to anyone else?
Thanks
Luigi
David Callu wrote:
> better to keep examples into the OpenSceneGraph/examples to keep sync
> with OSG core isn't it ??
>
>
> 2007/8/25, Robert Osfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>:
>
> Where to host the example source...
>
> 1) I see three options - zip files attached to the wiki
>
> 2) A svn repository for tutorial examples
>
> 3) Putting tutorial examples into the OpenSceneGraph/examples as part
> of the core OSG.
>
> Keeping the tutorials separate from the core OSG will require a
> maintainer for it, any volunteers? Keeping it separate does have an
> advantage of show how one builds applications outwith the standard OSG
> distribution.
>
> Putting tutorials into the core OSG has the advantage is that the
> code
> will be as easily any of the core OSG examples.
>
> Thoughts?
> Robert.
> _______________________________________________
> osg-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>osg-users mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
>
>
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
