Paul Martz wrote: > * We could spend time writing short whitepapers on various OSG topics,
I'd be very much in favour of this form of documentation. It allows users to pick and choose which papers to read, without having to buy lots of doxygen output or stuff they already know. Domain experts could write a paper, with maybe a editor-in-chief to ensure consistency. Admittedly I can see most of this work just coming down to two or three people, but the potential is there. Or maybe the domain expert could just write some notes and someone could be employed as a ghost-writer; this might be attractive to foreign users. Once enough have been written, they could be compiled into a paper book as a sort of "OSG Gems". This is something of a Utopian vision I admit, my experience tells me it wouldn't work out like this; but it'd be a reasonable idea to aim for. Incidentally, my offer to proof-read still stands. -JD ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
