Hi All,
IMHO, the svn:external scheme is far more complex than copying tags
("svn copy" is a very cheap operation in subversion). I won't argue on
which is best, they both achieve the same goal. But is this goal
(having a way to checkout the latest devel/stable release) of any use
to somebody else (other than setting up automatic nightly builds of
OSG) ? I'm using the vendor branches anyway.
Mathieu
2008/10/7 Jean-Sébastien Guay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi Paul,
>
>> Now that I think about it, perhaps making self-referential svn:externals
>> isn't such a great idea, hmmm :)
>
> You mean an svn:externals that points to some other directory in your
> repository? No, that's fine. It's the way the SVN book advises to replace
> the "modules" functionality. You create an empty directory in your repo, and
> then give it a bunch of externals that correspond to the specific parts of
> your repo that you want to be included in the module. It's kind of using
> svn:externals like a symlink.
>
> J-S
> --
> ______________________________________________________
> Jean-Sebastien Guay [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://www.cm-labs.com/
> http://whitestar02.webhop.org/
> _______________________________________________
> osg-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
>
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
