Hi All, IMHO, the svn:external scheme is far more complex than copying tags ("svn copy" is a very cheap operation in subversion). I won't argue on which is best, they both achieve the same goal. But is this goal (having a way to checkout the latest devel/stable release) of any use to somebody else (other than setting up automatic nightly builds of OSG) ? I'm using the vendor branches anyway.
Mathieu 2008/10/7 Jean-Sébastien Guay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Hi Paul, > >> Now that I think about it, perhaps making self-referential svn:externals >> isn't such a great idea, hmmm :) > > You mean an svn:externals that points to some other directory in your > repository? No, that's fine. It's the way the SVN book advises to replace > the "modules" functionality. You create an empty directory in your repo, and > then give it a bunch of externals that correspond to the specific parts of > your repo that you want to be included in the module. It's kind of using > svn:externals like a symlink. > > J-S > -- > ______________________________________________________ > Jean-Sebastien Guay [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.cm-labs.com/ > http://whitestar02.webhop.org/ > _______________________________________________ > osg-users mailing list > osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org > http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org > _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org