Hi Joe, Just looking at the two images, it really looks like you running two separate viewers. Is this right? Is it even two separate applications?
The OSG allows you to run a single viewer across multiple contexts and this is the usual way that OSG users will do multi-monitors. Is there a reason why you are using this approach? Robert. On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 5:14 PM, Joe Lyga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi again, > > I'm not having much success getting other operating systems to run correctly > on my vista machine. Windows XP doesn't support running off external drives > (and hacking it to work is a difficult process), and the latest Ubuntu live > cd I tried didn't have the correct nvidia graphics drivers. > > Anyway, I took a look at nvidia swap groups extension Robert mentioned. I > believe that synchronization between the graphics cards is something I'm > trying to avoid. Both graphics cards should be running independently. I'm > no expert, but judging by what I've seen so far and by looking at the stats > with vsync off, the second graphics card is waiting on the first. Could it > be that the second graphics card is trying to synchronize itself somehow > with the first graphics card? > > I reattached the stats with vsync off (first image = first graphics card, > second image = second graphics card) > Notice the inconsistant placement of the frame markers and the large amount > of empty space in the second image as opposed to the smooth performance of > the first. > > _______________________________________________ > osg-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org > > _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
