On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 1:28 PM, Dusten Sobotta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The integration of PAL with OSG would in my opinion, be a waste of > resources. PAL isn't maintained well, and doesn't support all of the > features of the engines that it contains. In addition, documentation is > -really- scarce for it. I do agree with Robert though, that any additions > made to OSG source should be generic to any particular engine; however I'm > not opposed to contributing to a library that specializes in a particular > engine beyond the scope of those changes.
PAL might serve as great resource for learning about doing the abstraction work for an osgPhysics. Robert. _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
