Hi Paul, On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Paul Martz <[email protected]> wrote: > If I understand correctly from this discussion, the intended usage is that > developers will leave OSG_USE_AGGRESSIVE_WARNINGS set to the default ON, and > we'll then tackle any warnings on a case by case basis, is that correct?
If we can leave the aggressive warnings on then I think this will be better, but we can only leave it on if the vast majority of the build is clean from warnings, spurious or not. I think the way to tackle this is to fix what warnings are practical and sensible to fix, and then disable the spurious ones. If we can't easily get a build clean from warnings on the major platforms then we'll need to disable the aggressive warnings by default on all platforms. I'd rather strive for a bit longer before falling back to this position. Robert. _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
