On 31/5/09 9:06 PM, Ismail Pazarbasi wrote:
2009/5/31 Ulrich Hertlein<u.hertl...@sandbox.de>:
Maybe because boost isn't exactly a light dependency to carry around?
...
sorry but what's so heavy about boost to carry around? Do you use
signal, thread or spirit, or files that require built shared libraries
that need to be deployed to target machine?
Well first of all it needs to be installed on every development system on every
development target. To have a consistent environment it might be better to be built from
source instead of binary packages.
Then there might be issues with having to ship shared libraries, runtime/linker problems
with older distributions, etc.
Maybe not, but you have to admit there's a lot more required than just work with what
comes with the standard.
Cheers,
/ulrich
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
