Hi Paul, On Wed, Mar 31, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Paul Martz <[email protected]> wrote: > Does anyone have any other thoughts or ideas on this? Seems like we need a > policy that we can use in OSG going forward, so that this same issue doesn't > keep creeping back into the code (only to be discovered the day before the > scheduled release :-( ...)
If the code is C++ then I would be inclined towards using unique namespaces for the different plugins. Some already do this. If the the code is C or pulled into from an external project like lib3ds then use of namespaces is problematic so making sure names are unique would be appropriate. static linking itself is something that we probably need to expand out tests for - the osgstaticviewer is the only example designed for static linking, and it only links with a couple of plugins. We could potentially expand this to include more plugins for testing purposes. Robert. _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
