Hi JS, Chuck, John et. al. On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Jean-Sébastien Guay <[email protected]> wrote: > But that means that on Win32 and anything other than APPLE, it will accept > old versions of CMake, and the FRAMEWORK keyword is not guarded to be used > only on APPLE everywhere it's used, so there's the problem.
Guarding the FRAMEWORK keyword sounds like the sensible thing to do, it's a bit of pain, but it would allow those using cmake out of the box on older OS spins to keep working. > I'd say we should use only one CMAKE_MINIMUM_REQUIRED version for all > platforms. Else it becomes a nightmare to maintain, you have to guard stuff > everywhere. So far it hasn't been a big problem, but it's something we should monitor - just how hassle is it to support older CMake versions. On a pure engineering standpoint I'd rather we'd just have a single CMake min version as well, but from a pragmatic standpoint it can shift the a small amount of disruption in one place to more disruption elsewhere. Where to draw the line is the difficult thing, something I try to do on a case by case basis when reviewing submissions, and by monitoring the pain threshold out in the community. Robert. _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
