On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Paul Martz <pma...@skew-matrix.com> wrote:
> Would this be an improvement that would better be separated into a >> distinct >> option string like OutputRelativeTextures or something like that? >> >> >> Yes, that's the way I'm leaning now. Your patch changes behavior, and >> would >> break any apps or utilities that depend on the current behavior. I'd be >> a >> lot more comfortable with this if it were a feature addition rather >> than a >> change to existing functionality. >> >> Do you think "OutputRelativeTextures" is a good name for it? If so, I >> can >> rewrite the submission locally (but you'll need to test it). >> >> -Paul >> >> >> It makes sense to me, at least. Thanks! >> > > Okay, this is now in. Please test. > > I've coded it so that if OutputRelativeTextures and OutputTextureFiles are > both present, OutputRelativeTextures will take precedent. > > -Paul > Thanks! I can confirm that this works properly! Noticed some other minor issues when testing this that probably should block 2.8.5 for now - will send to osg-submissions. Ryan -- Ryan Pavlik HCI Graduate Student Virtual Reality Applications Center Iowa State University rpav...@iastate.edu http://academic.cleardefinition.com Internal VRAC/HCI Site: http://tinyurl.com/rpavlik
_______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list osg-users@lists.openscenegraph.org http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
