Hi Isha,

The image data still looks corrupted to me - the lines aren't normal,
so I'd suspect this is part of the problem along with only part of the
image being read.

As to what the problem might be I can't answer.  I would suspect an
issue with DCMTK reading the image itself.  I don't have your imagery
so I can't test it out myself.  Could you post a link to the data and
a description of the command line options you are using?

Robert.

On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:46 PM, Isha Kandaswamy
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I tried loading it like that, it generates a volume, and looks much better 
> than before, but it still doesnt look right... It looks like most of the 
> image is getting cut off..So i tried loading only 1 dicom file and it looks 
> Like only the top 1/4th right hand corner of the image is getting rendered. I 
> dont understand why this is happening, but i assume the only reason that the 
> volume doesnt look proper is because of this..
>
> Maybe the image is too large to be rendered... I dont understand this 
> though.. could you explain to me, if this should be happening.. and is there 
> a way to render the whole image properly?
>
> Also I was reading some other posts and they talk about a transfer function.. 
> Does that make a difference in how the image is rendered??
>
> Thank you soo much for all your help...
>
> I have attached a screenshot, in which osg is shown as rendering the top 
> right portion of the mri scan only....
>
> ...
>
> Thank you!
>
> Cheers,
> Isha
>
> ------------------
> Read this topic online here:
> http://forum.openscenegraph.org/viewtopic.php?p=40231#40231
>
>
>
>
> Attachments:
> http://forum.openscenegraph.org//files/screenshot_102.png
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> osg-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
>
_______________________________________________
osg-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org

Reply via email to