Hi Robert, that's certainly an option, and it seems like the option that would place the least burden on developers. I like the idea.
Counting the lines of code in osgQt we have just under 2000 lines in implementation files, having that much code in headers shouldn't be too much of a problem. > > I don't know how feasible it is, it'd require us to automatically select > between Qt4 and Qt4 based in someway. Perhaps an osgQT/QT4 and osgQT/QT5 > headers could include all the appropriate parts required, and then have 3rd > party apps include which one they want, and have these set defines to select > the different paths. > Not even that is necessary, I think. The osgQt headers already have #if QT_VERSION_CHECK(...) macros to select the appropriate code. Users would be able to #include < osgQt/... > and automatically get the correct code for the Qt version that their application is using. It's a bit more work though to move that much code around, so for now I'm submitting the osgQt/Version fix. We can undo it later if the better fix comes around. ------------------ Read this topic online here: http://forum.openscenegraph.org/viewtopic.php?p=64078#64078 _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
