HI Julien, On 25 November 2017 at 19:02, Julien Valentin <[email protected]> wrote: > If I don't misunderstood: > Using a dedicated class for CS would introducing a new base class > "Dispatchable" for Drawable(vas) and DispatchCompute(no vas) that would > replace Drawable as Renderleaf. > Is that what you think about?
Drawable is the base class that wraps up dispatch, I'm not going to go have a base class for a base class just for the purpose of DispatchCompute. We have to avoid complicating the OSG class structure and avoid any CPU over-head associated with adding features, especially niche ones. The issue of VAS is one I'll need to look at, this will need to be switched off for DispatchCompute. I am not at my dev machine right now so will look into this later. Whatever solution we end up with we'll need an osg::DispatchCompute that wraps up glDispatchCommpute and it's parameters, this could be called explicitly as a callback or state attribute. The next step would be to make DispatchCompute a Drawable and work out how to switch off the VAS/DispalyList support. Robert. _______________________________________________ osg-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openscenegraph.org/listinfo.cgi/osg-users-openscenegraph.org
